Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Grey Crested Crane

  1. #1
    Paul Ricciardi
    Guest

    Default Grey Crested Crane

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Wish that this had been shot in the wild but alas what can you do except travel to Africa.

    Olympus E500, Sigma 50-500mm, ISO500, 290mm, f/7.1, handheld, no flash

    I'm pleased with the composition here but would like some critiques on the image. Personally I wish I had gotten the eye more in the shot, however not having it does add some mystery I suppose. It's not meant to be a "straight" wildlife shot, more artistic.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Fairfax, Virginia, United States
    Posts
    2,712
    Threads
    299
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Paul,
    I like the concept, but agree that a little more eye would make it better.

  3. #3
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    I like the idea and mood and agree with your self-critique. Since you don't have to travel to Africa to find this bird, I guess you can give it another try soon. :)

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Northern Kentucky
    Posts
    2,109
    Threads
    65
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Paul
    You, as others, have critiqued it well. The eye really is important and would have made a big difference here. I like your thinking on ways to make an interesting image. If you can, you might want to go back and try again with this bird. I also think that this image is a bit soft and could use just a bit of USM.

  5. #5
    Maxis Gamez
    Guest

    Default

    I like the mood on this one but I think the image needs to be brighter and with more contrast.

  6. #6
    Paul Ricciardi
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks for the replies guys.

    Lana: I agree it needs to be sharper, I USM'd it but it was also shot at 300mm handheld and at 1/60th of a second. The image is about as sharp as it's going to get. Between the sharpness and the eye thing I really really want to go back and try again someday soon.

    Maxis: I kind of like the darkness and lack of contrast. Most of my wildlife images are bright, saturated, and punchy but this is a slightly more subtle one for me. I have toyed with making it brighter and levelling it differently than I did, but I think that "quiet" mood is disturbed if the image becomes too bright with lots of contrast. I very much so appreciate the input, however, it's made me rethink the image some.

  7. #7
    Maxis Gamez
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Ricciardi View Post
    Thanks for the replies guys.

    Lana: I agree it needs to be sharper, I USM'd it but it was also shot at 300mm handheld and at 1/60th of a second. The image is about as sharp as it's going to get. Between the sharpness and the eye thing I really really want to go back and try again someday soon.

    Maxis: I kind of like the darkness and lack of contrast. Most of my wildlife images are bright, saturated, and punchy but this is a slightly more subtle one for me. I have toyed with making it brighter and levelling it differently than I did, but I think that "quiet" mood is disturbed if the image becomes too bright with lots of contrast. I very much so appreciate the input, however, it's made me rethink the image some.
    Hi Paul,

    I'm glad you have your own style.

    Thank you for sharing!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics