Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: A Norwegian 'Red' squirrel

  1. #1
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default A Norwegian 'Red' squirrel

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    On the last afternoon Malcolm, Phil & myself decided to have a wonder to find some 'Reds' in a forest close by before we went 'stir crazy' editing/deleting all the shots taken whilst in Norway. Jokingly folk said the local forest was dark due to the close proximity of the trees to one another, with little, if any, light getting through the canopy, how true - a touch would have helped, however...

    These 'reds' are much redder than our ones and in the next 4-6 weeks will have changed into pure black squirrels with lovely ear tuffs to boot. Enticed by a trail of hazelnuts we left out, these guys took their time, only to be plagued by three local Jays who were not frightened of anything and were only thinking of filling their beaks with the nuts.

    Thanks to those who commented on the previous image.

    Steve

    Subject: Eurasian red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris)
    Location: Norway
    Camera: Canon 1DX MKII
    Lens: 500f/4 MKII with 1.4x MKIII HH
    Exposure: 1/800s at f/5.6 ISO6400
    Original format: Portrait, almost FF width, slight crop from the top
    Processed via: LRCC & PSCC2017

  2. #2
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,331
    Threads
    2,663
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Lovely shot Steve great details. I would be tempted to lift the exposure of the mid tones ever so slightly.

  3. #3
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    11,254
    Threads
    1,271
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Steve a sweet Red One .
    A classy pose you captured and the overall detail and color / tone combo is good as it can be . Stunning IQ as expected . Two things are a bit distracting but bet you could not make them better , the FG does look messy and the bright spots on the rotten stump .I think the bright spots could be addressed ...with your skills .
    Just wondering what kind of " perch " this was ...? A lower POV would have been better , well if possible .
    The squirrel itself does look stunning , and you managed a nice exposure in the dark forest . Surprised about your settings

    TFS Andreas

  4. #4
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cheers Andreas

    Two things are a bit distracting but bet you could not make them better , the FG does look messy and the bright spots on the rotten stump .I think the bright spots could be addressed ...with your skills
    Correct, not the greatest of locations to say the least and zero chance of any gardening to improve both the FG and logs. The brights spots were a pain and if you push it too much you easily spot signs of 'tinkering', sometimes it's best to leave things alone.


    The squirrel itself does look stunning , and you managed a nice exposure in the dark forest .
    Thanks, perhaps darker than your Marmots, but just simple ETTR to maximise the data.

    Surprised about your settings
    DoF or SS?

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I would be tempted to lift the exposure of the mid tones ever so slightly.
    Cheers Jon, but remember, what do Midtones contain, detail.

  6. #6
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    11,254
    Threads
    1,271
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Surprised about your SS

    How about throwing in some color in the bright spots ?

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Surprised about your SS
    Static subject and I really wasn't wanting to up the ISO from 6400, it was good enough, could have gone to f/4.


    How about throwing in some color in the bright spots ?
    It just starts to look odd, although I really didn't push it to find out.

  8. #8
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    11,254
    Threads
    1,271
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    You must be a magician ....if you can shoot F4 with this kit

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,667
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sumptuous tones and colour on that little squirrel - not to mention gorgeous detail. That bright background log is a little distracting but you have tried playing with it without success from the sound of things. The only thing that feels odd to me in this one is the composition, especially the 'topsy turvy' nature of the open air bottom and vegetated top half. I does seem weird and distracting to me and wonder it would be worth trying a few more options here.

  10. #10
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The only thing that feels odd to me in this one is the composition, especially the 'topsy turvy' nature of the open air bottom and vegetated top half.
    The issue is that the subject is on a 'nursing' log/tree with all the spindles and fine branches coming off it, creating the 'clutter' I think Glen, sadly can't see another option.

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Nagpur, India
    Posts
    3,837
    Threads
    245
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Steve -- Beauty of a subject , liked the details and IQ . The settings are not that bad , but a lover POV would have been far better, but i am sure you would have gone for it had that been an option. At the risk of repeating the previously mentioned comment, I feel ss is on a very lower side considering that you were HH with a TC .

    Still a very nice image. TFS !

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,667
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    The issue is that the subject is on a 'nursing' log/tree with all the spindles and fine branches coming off it, creating the 'clutter' I think Glen, sadly can't see another option.
    I was thinking changing the composition to make that element less obvious. But just a thought and I wasn't sure how best to recompose.

  13. #13
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Surprised about your SS. You must be a magician ....if you can shoot F4 with this kit
    Hi Andreas & Haseeb with good control you can do it, but not always advisable, the RAW is sharp which is critical and for me that is all that matters. With f/5.6 I'm right on the edge, removing the 1.4 and dropping to f/4 would have increased my DoF fractionally, but also increased SS, however then I would need to crop, all a trade off. No need I felt to have more SS here, just good control.

    I was thinking changing the composition to make that element less obvious.
    Glenn I could add a slight Blur filter.

  14. #14
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Glenn, it's a tad crude, but perhaps something along these lines at the foot?

    Cheers
    Steve

  15. Thanks Glenn Pure thanked for this post
  16. #15
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,667
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Glenn, it's a tad crude, but perhaps something along these lines at the foot?
    I had wondered about making that part less obvious and you are obviously thinking the same. I'm not sure it helps a lot though. On balance, it may be impractical to do anything about this. The only reason I raised it in the first place was that it just felt odd to me and drew my attention and thoughts away from the squirrel. Maybe it doesn't do that for others though.

  17. #16
    Story Sequences Moderator and Wildlife Moderator Gabriela Plesea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    7,834
    Threads
    461
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dear Steve,

    A very good evening to you, and my apologies for coming in so late. Superb colours and tonality, subject is super cute. Indeed a busy environment but nothing you could do about it. At first I wondered whether taking off a tad from the bottom would make a difference but when I tried it was not happy with the outcome. So it's the OP for me, the blur in the RP seems a bit unnatural but I guess it was quickly done for demo purposes. Love the pose from the squirrel and those little paws with cute little toes just adorable. Beautiful detail and the eye stands out so nicely. Squirrel looks so tiny... could it fit in the palm of my hand?

    Have a lovely evening, thank you so much for sharing,

    Kind regards,
    Gabriela Plesea

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics