Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Father and Daughter

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    248
    Threads
    47
    Thank You Posts

    Default Father and Daughter

    Name:  Father and Daughter [BPN].jpg
Views: 58
Size:  318.1 KB
    And to think I wasn't going to go out for photos because of bad weather. There was no more room to back up and my other lenses were in my car across the creek. If I had a shorter lens I would have framed it to where you could see his full antlers and the young ones other ear. But then again, maybe it would have lost some of the intimacy if I did. None the less, I feel pretty fortunate to have seen and shot this.

    Nikon D500 ~ Handheld
    Nikkor 600mm f/4e FL ED VR
    1/1640
    f/4
    ISO-1600
    Matrix Metering

    8x10 Crop - full vertical image remains, the crop removed a little from the right.
    Small bright spot removed from the upper-left BG via content-aware fill in PS

    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    September 2017
    Late day, cool, overcast and light showers

  2. #2
    Landscapes Moderator Andrew McLachlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Thornton, Ontario
    Posts
    6,039
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wonderful sharpness on the buck and a nice tender moment made better by the tight framing. I do wish for the fawn's eye to be in sharp focus. Perhaps a contrast mask applied to the eye would help a bit.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,667
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Daniel, noted your point about not being able to get back any further. What a curse! A beautiful moment captured all the same. The male deer looks wonderful as does the background. Beautiful clarity, tones and colours. Shame about the DOF here. I'm not sure what aperture you would have to use to get a lot more in focus.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,804
    Threads
    710
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Lovely intimate moment well captured here Daniel, I hear you on the DOF aspect and frankly if you were as close as it appears, I doubt even f/10 would have been sufficient, putting you over the D500's ISO limits, IMO. These big prime have such narrow DOF when shot at close quarters.

    TFS


  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Daniel - Definitely a tender moment. Agree about the sharpness of the fawn but understand the dof limitations. Love dad's eyelashes.

    Don't forget to give your thoughts on other people's wildlife images. We recommend commenting on 3-5 other wildlife images each time you post one of your own. It's the best way to get the most out of BPN, fosters a sense of community and allows us to all learn from each other. Your comments don't have to be technical, just tell us what you like and don't like about an image.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    248
    Threads
    47
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew McLachlan View Post
    Wonderful sharpness on the buck and a nice tender moment made better by the tight framing. I do wish for the fawn's eye to be in sharp focus. Perhaps a contrast mask applied to the eye would help a bit.
    I don't know anything about "contrast masking" Andrew. I'll certainly look into it - thanks!

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    248
    Threads
    47
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn Pure View Post
    Daniel, noted your point about not being able to get back any further. What a curse! A beautiful moment captured all the same. The male deer looks wonderful as does the background. Beautiful clarity, tones and colours. Shame about the DOF here. I'm not sure what aperture you would have to use to get a lot more in focus.
    Thanks Glenn! I really like the BG also. I probably could have given 1-2 stops of ISO and 1 SS for 3 stops of aperture, but I still don't think it would have captured this fawn well enough.

  8. Thanks Glenn Pure thanked for this post
  9. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    248
    Threads
    47
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    You nailed it Marc. I was less than double minimum focusing distance. Always a balancing act with these settings and getting the most out of your gear.

  10. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    248
    Threads
    47
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachel Hollander View Post
    Hi Daniel - Definitely a tender moment. Agree about the sharpness of the fawn but understand the dof limitations. Love dad's eyelashes.

    Don't forget to give your thoughts on other people's wildlife images. We recommend commenting on 3-5 other wildlife images each time you post one of your own. It's the best way to get the most out of BPN, fosters a sense of community and allows us to all learn from each other. Your comments don't have to be technical, just tell us what you like and don't like about an image.

    TFS,
    Rachel
    Thanks Rachel - I'll be routing through here a little later when I'm on break at work for comments and such. I've been pretty quiet on here lately but plan on picking things up very soon.

  11. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    10,421
    Threads
    1,708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is great love the interaction and the framing nice background as well.

  12. #11
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi David, can only echo Marc's feedback here.

    TFS
    Steve

    PS Just watch the © mark doesn't become too dominant, perhaps just temper the opacity a little.

  13. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    248
    Threads
    47
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Mack View Post
    This is great love the interaction and the framing nice background as well.
    Thanks John!

  14. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    248
    Threads
    47
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi David, can only echo Marc's feedback here.

    TFS
    Steve

    PS Just watch the © mark doesn't become too dominant, perhaps just temper the opacity a little.
    Thanks Steve! I agree, I do need to cut the size down a bit on my watermark add a bit of opacity. It's funny you said that, I was just going through LR and deleting all the watermarks I've saved over the past year since creating it. By the way - am I David? ;)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics