Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Female Scarlet Robin

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,667
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default Female Scarlet Robin

    Name:  IMG_2185-BPN.jpg
Views: 180
Size:  350.9 KB

    Hi all, a whole bird shot from me for my second post here. The lighting was not ideal for this shot, being full sun. Fortunately, the tonal range isn't too extreme (the males of this species are much worse). This shot also was close to blowing the red channel but a little better than my recent rainbow lorikeet shot in that area. All comments appreciated. My view is that this shot may be a little boring: a bird on a stick with nothing in the background although I do like the intense stare as she is keenly scanning the ground for her next snack.
    Details as follows: Canon 80D with EF 100-400 (MkI) at 400mm handheld. Aperture priority exposure 1/400 sec, f8, ISO 1600. Processed in Canon DPP 4 (digital lens optimiser, crop, lighting adjustments, default NR) then exported 16 bit TIFF to Photoshop Elements with Neat Image NR plugin. Very light NR applied to bird and stronger NR to background. Lighten shadows on bird's eye. Some distracting blurs on the left of the frame cloned out. Sharpened after size reduction (bird only).

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Euclid, Ohio
    Posts
    1,031
    Threads
    188
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful bird Glenn. The background is great and you did a great job in post.
    The only negative is the head angle.

    I do have one question...you said it was full sun, but your ISO was at 1600?
    I would expect that number to be a lot lower.

    Doug

  3. Thanks Glenn Pure thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,667
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Doug, thank you for your comments. Regarding your question on light levels and exposure needed, I could have dropped the ISO but I was partly experimenting as I hadn't had the 80D for that long and was seeing what I could get away with. I should have also mentioned I pulled this back half a stop in post-processing. This shot was taken in August last year and as I'm in the Southern Hemisphere, it was winter when the sun intensity is much weaker.

    Regarding the head angle, I'm aware it would generally be considered a negative but that may in part be due to unfamiliarity with this species. The pose is very typical. These robins land on low perches and scout the ground intensely for insects, pouncing when they see one. That's what the bird is doing here and I wanted to capture its hunting behavior. If the bird had been turned away from me any more, I probably would have not bothered with the shot though.

  5. #4
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Waynesville, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    1,344
    Threads
    226
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Glenn ,nice capture. Understand about the head angle . Great feather detail.Had no idea a robin species definitely a different bird than the one we have in the states. Looking forward for future posts.

  6. Thanks Glenn Pure thanked for this post
  7. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,667
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you Kevin. We have around a dozen robin species, many of them brightly coloured - red or yellow typically - like the scarlet robin. Many of them (maybe all of them?) hunt in much the same way. They are good subjects for photography because they sit still on their perches while looking out for the next meal - unlike many smaller birds which are often constantly on the move.

  8. #6
    BPN Member Tim Foltz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Southern CA
    Posts
    1,434
    Threads
    197
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Glenn, nice bird, BG and details. To bad about the head angle would also like to see it higher in the frame.

    -Tim

  9. Thanks Glenn Pure thanked for this post
  10. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,667
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Name:  IMG_2185-v2.jpg
Views: 164
Size:  376.3 KB

    Hi Tim, thank you again - is this what you were suggesting?

  11. #8
    BPN Member Tim Foltz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Southern CA
    Posts
    1,434
    Threads
    197
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn Pure View Post
    Name:  IMG_2185-v2.jpg
Views: 164
Size:  376.3 KB

    Hi Tim, thank you again - is this what you were suggesting?
    Yes, much better IMO.

  12. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Millington Md.
    Posts
    2,513
    Threads
    365
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Glenn....very nice work again! I wonder if you could lighten up that eye just a tad more. You might try duplicating the layer and applying a screen blend mode. Everything will get very light but then you could apply a black mask and paint in the just the eye. Finally adjust the opacity. I often use this technique to lighten eyes just a bit.

  13. Thanks Glenn Pure thanked for this post
  14. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,667
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Bob, thanks for your comments and suggestions. I can lighten the eye more than I already have quite easily with a selection and finely feathered edge. Layer masks will also work but I avoid layers as much as possible as I have to down the file to 8 bits (at least in my old version of Photoshop Elements - has adobe improved here in new versions of PS/PSE?). I like to work with the file at 16 bits for as far as possible in the workflow. I think your change would make the image visually stronger but in this instance, I'm going to resist because the eye is in shadow and I personally haven't got to the point where I'd be comfortable with lightening it too far. I lightened it just enough to make the detail visible in the original capture a little more obvious but no more than that. I hope I'm not out of line here or being disrespectful?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics