Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Little owl (C)

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    West Midlands, England
    Posts
    127
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default Little owl (C)

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi All
    Here is a photo from a Bird Of Prey workshop with rescued birds, I recently attended. I would appreciate your feedback.

    1/80, F5.6, ISO 800
    Overcast
    Hand Held
    Sigma 105mm
    Lightroom, Photoshop CC

    Mike
    Last edited by arash_hazeghi; 06-23-2017 at 12:22 AM.

  2. #2
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Mike, the image looks very Saturated, with a hefty Yellow & Green to it, if you have time I would reduce the Saturation, Contrast & Blacks and then work from there. If this is cropped, then less on the LHS and more on the right I feel would balance the framing, however I very much like the fixed stare a classic with this subject. Remember to include the camera model in your intro, but I see it's a 5DMKIII. At 1/80SS I wonder just how sharp the RAW is, I would have gone straight to ISO3200 for more SS, any noise in the shadows can be easily be addressed in LR and if correctly exposed you would have been fine.

    Here is a photo from a Bird Of Prey workshop with rescued birds
    Was this with Vince, or down in the Cotswolds??? I assume these are 'captive' subjects and if so you need to add a 'C' in the tile to indicate captive .

    The RP attached is certainly not ideal, but hopefully some 'food for thought'.

    TFS
    Steve

  3. #3
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,556
    Threads
    1,321
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steve did a great job with the repost taking care of the color. cast. I wish the FG was a bit less distracting but those eyes are perfect. TFS
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  4. Thanks Mike Singh thanked for this post
  5. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    West Midlands, England
    Posts
    127
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi Mike, the image looks very Saturated, with a hefty Yellow & Green to it, if you have time I would reduce the Saturation, Contrast & Blacks and then work from there. If this is cropped, then less on the LHS and more on the right I feel would balance the framing, however I very much like the fixed stare a classic with this subject. Remember to include the camera model in your intro, but I see it's a 5DMKIII. At 1/80SS I wonder just how sharp the RAW is, I would have gone straight to ISO3200 for more SS, any noise in the shadows can be easily be addressed in LR and if correctly exposed you would have been fine.


    Was this with Vince, or down in the Cotswolds??? I assume these are 'captive' subjects and if so you need to add a 'C' in the tile to indicate captive .

    The RP attached is certainly not ideal, but hopefully some 'food for thought'.

    TFS
    Steve
    Thanks for your feedback Steve.
    It was an overcast and wet day so the greens and yellows in the foliage were well saturated. As we were under a tree the yellow/green light was filtering through. I did do a white balance in processing. I have a preference for saturated colours. Your edit is notably less saturated than my version. I will have a play again with my image. I did use SS 1/80 with IS turned on as it works very well with the Sigma 105 mm. I am currently trying higher ISOs for my wildlife photos.

    This workshop was conducted by Scott Latham in Tamworth.

    Thanks
    Mike

  6. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    West Midlands, England
    Posts
    127
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi Mike, the image looks very Saturated, with a hefty Yellow & Green to it, if you have time I would reduce the Saturation, Contrast & Blacks and then work from there. If this is cropped, then less on the LHS and more on the right I feel would balance the framing, however I very much like the fixed stare a classic with this subject. Remember to include the camera model in your intro, but I see it's a 5DMKIII. At 1/80SS I wonder just how sharp the RAW is, I would have gone straight to ISO3200 for more SS, any noise in the shadows can be easily be addressed in LR and if correctly exposed you would have been fine.


    Was this with Vince, or down in the Cotswolds??? I assume these are 'captive' subjects and if so you need to add a 'C' in the tile to indicate captive .

    The RP attached is certainly not ideal, but hopefully some 'food for thought'.

    TFS
    Steve
    Thanks for your feedback Steve.
    It was an overcast and wet day so the greens and yellows in the foliage were well saturated. As we were under a tree the yellow/green light was filtering through. I did do a white balance in processing. I have a preference for saturated colours. Your edit is notably less saturated than my version. I will have a play again with my image. I did use SS 1/80 with IS turned on as it works very well with the Sigma 105 mm. I am currently trying higher ISOs for my wildlife photos.

    This workshop was conducted by Scott Latham in Tamworth.

    Thanks
    Mike

  7. #6
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Mike, based on your explanation of the environment, then yes, things would be more richer & saturated, but not to the degree I would say of the OP. Setting a WB, and it all depends on how you do it, should reduce/remove any casts and provide a platform in which to the tackle the 'Colour management' of the image providing you get a mid grey across all three channels.

    With a very shot lens and close proximity to a subject should allow good detail/sharpness, but HH at low SS is best to be avoided.

  8. Thanks Mike Singh thanked for this post
  9. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    West Midlands, England
    Posts
    127
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi Mike, based on your explanation of the environment, then yes, things would be more richer & saturated, but not to the degree I would say of the OP. Setting a WB, and it all depends on how you do it, should reduce/remove any casts and provide a platform in which to the tackle the 'Colour management' of the image providing you get a mid grey across all three channels.

    With a very shot lens and close proximity to a subject should allow good detail/sharpness, but HH at low SS is best to be avoided.
    Thanks Steve.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    West Midlands, England
    Posts
    127
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arash_hazeghi View Post
    Steve did a great job with the repost taking care of the color. cast. I wish the FG was a bit less distracting but those eyes are perfect. TFS
    Thanks Arash
    That's what you get when you shoot an owl in a tree a distracting fore and background.
    This one has a less distractions:
    http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...o-from-England


    Mike


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics