Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Female Cardinal

  1. #1
    BPN Limited Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    7
    Threads
    4
    Thank You Posts

    Default Female Cardinal

    Name:  GN8A6731.3.JPG
Views: 90
Size:  384.7 KB

    Shot this with 7D MII and EF300 2.8 Camera setting was manual f 2.8, 1/800th second, at ISO 500, with evaluative metering. Basic adjustments with DPP4, cropped, white balance changed to shade, raised exposure, contrast and sharpened a bit.

    Critique and comment are welcome and appreciated

  2. #2
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,333
    Threads
    2,665
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mathew, a good shot but insufficient depth of field, ask yourself where is it in best focus, ideally it should be the eye. To increase DOF you have two options, increase aperture and/or decrease magnification i.e. use a shorter focal length or move further back. I suspect you thought you would go for high quality at ISO 500 but I doubt you would have to much problem at ISO 1600. Hope this helps. Bare in mind the oft quoted a "good noisy one is better than a soft non noisy one".

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Staten Island, New York
    Posts
    3,124
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I think you have a nice look back pose here. Interesting perch and I like the vine that is wrapping around the perch as well.

    As Jonathan mentioned, the head is not sharp. Interestingly the beak looks OK but the head crest looks soft. You always want the head and eye to be sharp. As someone who has owned the 7d2 since the first day it came out, I have rarely been happy shooting above ISO 800. For a shot like this I think it would have been better to shoot at ISO 800 at about f5.6 or even higher. I think your shutter speed would have been similar and you would have had sufficient depth of field to get the whole bird sharp. Keep in mind that the closer you are, the less depth of field you have to work with.

    As is the bird is too tight in the frame. I would give more room above and to the right.

    Shot has more noise than I would expect for ISO 500. It would benefit from applying NR to the background.

    Also the vine that is intersecting the tail is distracting as well.

  4. Thanks Krishna Prasad kotti thanked for this post
  5. #4
    BPN Limited Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    7
    Threads
    4
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    All good feed back; points all valid and well taken Thanks guys!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics