Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Barn Swallow

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Portland,OR
    Posts
    193
    Threads
    58
    Thank You Posts

    Default Barn Swallow

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Inspired by Al's Martin photo, I tried some swallow photos. I have a long way to go!

    Canon 40D, 100-400@ 300mm
    1/1250, f/5.6, ISO 400

    The light is pretty harsh at 9:30am. Should have tried these pics earlier.

    Wish the eye could be seen.

    C&C appreciated. Thanks for viewing.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,940
    Threads
    288
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wow ! To me, it's like you're very close to there. If you want to see what's "there's a long way to go", you should see my swallow flight shots. Of course you won't because they're so bad that I dare not post them here :o

    Yours at least looks sharp, good wing position IMO. Just have to lighten some shadow areas.

    BTW, what's the background, sky, water...?

  3. #3
    Oscar Zangroniz
    Guest

    Default

    Great capture Kent. I'm viewing it on my laptop and it seems that the bird has a lot of noise.
    Regards

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Portland,OR
    Posts
    193
    Threads
    58
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, Guys.

    Desmond, I suspect you are being too modest. I have admired your photos very much. The background is water.
    Oscar, I'll try using dfine on it to reduce the noise, but I think it is probably due to dodging and burning the head area.

  5. #5
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    The wing position looks great but it would have helped a lot if the sun would have been behind you and with this kind of BG you need to dial in positive exposure compensation, +1 or so. Keep trying!

  6. #6
    Nonda Surratt
    Guest

    Default

    Ohooo they are so tough. Really nice wing position!

  7. #7
    William Malacarne
    Guest

    Default

    Kent

    What type of metering did you use?

    Bill

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Portland,OR
    Posts
    193
    Threads
    58
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Bill --

    Av; evaluative.

    Axel is right (of course!) If I had had the light behind me, exposure would have been simplified, for then I wouldn't have highlights on the top of the head and the rest of the bird in shadows.

    So I'm learning, but sometimes even the things I know don't sink in! Senior processing problems.

    Thanks all for looking and commenting. I appreciate your taking time to help.

  9. #9
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Kent If you can do post the exposure compensation used and if it was made in manual how was the exposure derived Does make a huge difference in being able to help you

    As presented the image is underexposed. Trying to fix it in PS will bring out sever noise since it is a dark bird. With whites you can get away with a lot !!! The bg looks pleasing but the bird dark so I assume it was off sun angle. I do like the pose and sharpness!!!!

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Portland,OR
    Posts
    193
    Threads
    58
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Av mode, no Exp Comp.

    You are exactly right (as usual!). the sun angle was to the left and slightly behind the bird. The noise is a result of trying to fix things in PS. You are soooo good! Thanks for all the help from everyone. This is site rules!

  11. #11
    Gus Cobos
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Kent,
    I like the capture and the flight angle; but its full of noise and a wee bit under exposed...:confused::eek::D

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics