Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Azalia

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyre Forest Worcestershire
    Posts
    4,096
    Threads
    557
    Thank You Posts

    Default Azalia

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Varigated Leaved Azalia
    D7100
    Sigma 50 mm macro
    100 ISO
    25th sec @f 5
    10 stacked images in Combine ZP
    Slight crop
    Curves in Paintshop Pro 7
    Sharpen only for web>
    Cheers
    JohnR

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    1,873
    Threads
    320
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi John,
    Nice job with the focus stacking - all looks crisp to me. I like the BG too - was it natural? Lovely image.
    Allen

  3. #3
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,287
    Threads
    2,653
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nicely presented subject, DOF looks good. Purely from a personal aesthetic point of view I find the flowers a bit busy, my eye doesn't readily settle but that is of course the feature of the azalea - colours look OK but screen not calibrated at present.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyre Forest Worcestershire
    Posts
    4,096
    Threads
    557
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks both .
    Always hard when its a bunch of flowers in a clump - and hard to separate one or two without spoiling the plant. Good stacking excuse though!
    JohnR

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyre Forest Worcestershire
    Posts
    4,096
    Threads
    557
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Allen
    Sorry - forgot to reply to you.
    Hard to annswer !!
    Its a natural backgound photographed in the garden. Then printed A3 on matte papere and used as a background!!. So its natural to start with and then not !!
    Cheers
    John

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Semi-natural BG is wonderful! The reds are very low in contrast though, and too much red creeping into the leaves and stems. Should be fixable.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyre Forest Worcestershire
    Posts
    4,096
    Threads
    557
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Diane
    Will have a play later thanks
    John
    PS Will be tricky as the stems are red.

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyre Forest Worcestershire
    Posts
    4,096
    Threads
    557
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Diane
    Had a play. Must admit - I dont like the flower colour at all.
    Can't get it right.
    John

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I agree -- red tonalities are not at all right here. What should be the darker areas inside the blossoms have gone too light and blown out. I'll see if I can suggest something later but no time now. Anything would really involve going back to the unadjusted capture to do it best.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    For starters just do a simple Levels and do an Auto adjust -- on the original. That will make the flowers better and get rid of the red stems.

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyre Forest Worcestershire
    Posts
    4,096
    Threads
    557
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Diane Posts must have criossed.
    This is the original on auto
    Piuty about the stems as they are red
    Cheers
    John

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Stems may be red but should leaves be pinkish / brownish? But you're the judge of how it should look! It just looks odd to me.

    Is it a new JPEG capture or an old film shot? If film, slide or neg?

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    985
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I have a lot to learn from this photo. I prefer the flowers' tonality on Pane #11 but the BG has an odd cyan cast to it. I am following this thread to keep up with the discussion. Thanks for sharing this work, John.

  14. #14
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyre Forest Worcestershire
    Posts
    4,096
    Threads
    557
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Diane/Adhika
    Its the original un touched except re sized for the forum. I took several other series so I,ll have a look. I think I,ll just bin it and try something else
    John

  15. #15
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    My comment in the Crassula thread about getting accurate color would apply here, too. Of course, with a very 3D subject like this, you might possibly be getting reflected colors that are "tainting" some parts differently. For instance, if the plant was sitting on a colored tablecloth or light was bouncing off colored walls or the like.

  16. #16
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I think reds and Azaleas are both challenging to photograph, so you have double difficulty here. The flowers are lovely, as is the shape of the group. Good job with focus stacking; all the flowers are in focus.

    I think the reds are too saturated in the OP. When I checked levels, the reds were out of bounds. I lowered the saturation of reds, magentas, and maybe some other color. I desaturated the bg a bit using Sponge tool. I did several Levels adjustments and lowered brightness and contrast. The question is whether this image looks like the flowers themselves, or, the way you want it to look.

  17. #17
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Anita, this is a difficult image and I think your version is an improvement, but I'm not sure I see what I'd call saturation in the reds. I'm curious, when you opened the OP in PS, you should have gotten a warning that there is no profile (John's software doesn't give him the option to attach one). In answer to the choices in that message, you should answer to Assign sRGB (this is a case where you do assign a profile) because John does submit the images as sRGB, just not tagged with the profile. And then be sure to check the box to convert to your working space. Only then will you see the histogram correctly. See my tutorial in Educational Resources on When the Histogram is Wrong.

    Reds are flat, but not blown. The correct histogram is above.

    I think the main issue is that the red and green channels have low contrast. Look at the Channels palette in PS to see the dramatic difference in the centers of the flowers. Then go to the color channels in Levels or Curves and move the left slider in for Red and Green to improve things somewhat.
    Last edited by Diane Miller; 05-21-2016 at 04:54 PM.

  18. #18
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Diane:

    There was no notice when I opened the OP.

    I have followed your instructions and assigned sRGB. There is no box to convert to my working space. Can't I just work with sRGB? Or do you want me to convert it to RGB?

    What do you mean by "correct" histogram? I confess that I never look at the histogram when processing my images. The top histogram is the one for the OP after assigning it the sRGB profile. It looks to me as if there is too much red. The bottom histogram is of the image I posted above. It looks similar to your "correct" histogram.

  19. #19
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I don't see where the first histogram came from, as it is not the correct one. Possibly your software is set to choose to ignore the profile and in that case it will use your monitor profile. That is doubly wrong.

    Go to Edit > Color Settings and follow the instructions in the tutorial in Educational Resources here on When the Histogram is Wrong. That warning is very important and setting it is so simple.

    If you are using sRGB as your working space in PS, you may not get the checkbox to convert to your working space as it will already be there when you choose sRGB. sRGB is the default PS working color space but Adobe RGB is better if you ever print things.

    "RGB" is not a color space. It is a color model, like LAB or several others. The relevant working color spaces for photography are sRGB, Adobe RGB and ProPhoto RGB.

    Read the tutorials -- they are my best effort at explaining this stuff. If something isn't clear let me know -- I'm happy to rewrite!

  20. #20
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    To try to clarify a little more -- if you never changed the default, sRGB is your PS working space. That's the simplest from a workflow standpoint. But i don't understand where your initial histogram came from. The image was in sRGB but not tagged and should have given you a warning that no profile was attached. That doesn't mean there isn't one -- there always is, but the software needs to know what it is to display the histogram correctly. The colors may or may not be displayed correctly, depending on your choices to answer a profile mismatch or a missing profile in Edit > Color Settings.

    The histogram is a light and color meter on steroids. It is reliable way above any monitor, when the image is correctly color managed. I refer to it constantly.
    Last edited by Diane Miller; 05-21-2016 at 05:49 PM.

  21. #21
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Diane: Thanks for sharing your knowledge. Lots for me to learn.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics