Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Starling

  1. #1
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,778
    Threads
    1,094
    Thank You Posts

    Default Starling

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon 1DX
    f/4 500mm with 1.4
    f/5.6
    1/1250
    ISO 800

    I captured this one on the seashore, at the weekend. What a difference a little sunlight makes, to the colours on this bird.

    Will



  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    8,509
    Threads
    827
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great colors and pattern captured, Will.

  3. #3
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Will, looks a bit 'noisy' in the shadows/iridescent chest plumage, especially considering it's ISO800. I would tame the whites & highlights, but if this is FF rather than cropped, I would expect to have seen more detail. I wonder if you had moved more to the right (if possible?) then you would have had more of the 'golden' backdrop? Like the idea of a different perch.

    TFS
    Steve

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Not sure about this one Will.
    I love the perch.
    I would decrease the exposure slightly on the entire image. It seems too bright to my eye.
    Agree with Steve's comments so will not repeat his good advice,
    Gail

  5. #5
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,778
    Threads
    1,094
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the comments. Hi Steve, The plumage, as you know, on the Starling, is very oily and wet looking, even when dry. Maybe I over sharpened a little too much, on the bird. It was about a 50% crop. Unfortunately I was surrounded by rocks and sea water, so I couldn't get a better angle on the bird. I agree, it would be better if the BG was all gold coloured. Hi Gail, I have decreased the exp on this repost.

    Will

    Name:  Starling.jpg
Views: 37
Size:  388.6 KB

  6. #6
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Will, was the exposure right, or did you have to open the image up, lift the darks/shadows?

  7. #7
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,778
    Threads
    1,094
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I had to lift the shadows Steve

  8. #8
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I had to lift the shadows Steve
    Therefore you will introduce noise Will as per in the plumage, hence my comment, but please don't say you used Highlight/Shadow tool . This is why getting the exposure right is oh so key, set the camera to show blown highlights and do NOT enable Highlight priority, ETTR. Darkening an image if required is easier than lightening it.

  9. #9
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,778
    Threads
    1,094
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Never used the shadows/highlight tool done in RAW. all advice noted, thanks Steve.

    Will

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Lincolnshire UK.
    Posts
    4,951
    Threads
    187
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Will,the same as Gail was not sure about this one but could not put my finger on why?think the comments between yourself and Steve have given me most of the answers,also that you have the different plumage between summer and winter birds.they are a cracking bird to work on and think your Barnacle covered rock is so different as a perch.

    Keith.

  11. #11
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Will, the light has brought out the various colours nicely, and a Starling I havent seen before. Comp wise, I would come up from the bottom a bit, and take a bit off the RHS. I agree there is visible noise, but nothing your new toy cant sort out in the future with regards to the correct exposure. But you knew that.

  12. #12
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Tricky one Will, I saw your original post but decided to look again in different room light. I still get the impression you may be able to get more out of the raw file.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics