Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Muntjac buck (baited from a hide)

  1. #1
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,179
    Threads
    103
    Thank You Posts

    Icon1 Muntjac buck (baited from a hide)

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Another image from the hide we visit occassionally to practice really. The deer are wild but habituated to people ,so a different ball park altogether to my recent fallow bucks. Cheers for all the help there!! One of my first outings with the mark iv taken back in sept.

    Canon 1Div 300 2.8 ext iii Probably I should have removed the ext but one never knows what one will see here and what distance. Cropped from landscape to portrait as he was basically so close I couldn't frame him so went for this study. Processed in dpp4

    iso 2000
    f/4
    TV 1/200

    thanks for all the previous help

    take care

    Stu

  2. #2
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Stu, the image looks very soft, have you applied any sharpening? If you have, then I feel you may have some camera shake. Your SS wasn't in your favour either at 1/200, hence DoF at f/4 too I guess. If this was attracted by food then I would try to get the deer more out in the open, but close to the edge of the forest so he/she can dart back into cover if they feel threatened.

    TFS
    Steve

  3. #3
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,179
    Threads
    103
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cheers Steve,it's a public hide really not my thing ,but good practice,so I have no control over the food given. I'd rather chase the wild ones to be honest,but at this stage I need to take pictures,so this spot has it's merits for me.
    I'm surprised on the softness Steve,but i'm sure you are right,sadly. Yes the shutter is low it's a tricky place to shoot but good to learn from. I was fighting for light !!

    thanks buddy

    take care

    Stu

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Stu - Unfortunately first thing I noticed is the softness. It really kills the image for me. I think it comes down to your slow ss and probably some camera shake considering lens and t/c. You might want to consider a monopod in tight situations with that combo.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Stu, I agree 100% get the practice in, that can only benefit your skill set, but photographing them in the wild you cannot beat.

    Open the image up in DPP and look where the Focus point was. As you can see the RH side is soft, likewise the nose, but that could well be DoF, the actual coat doesn't look too bad. I would run some NR on the BKF, but adding some more sharpening doesn't really help, I would also crop a bit tighter.

  6. #6
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,179
    Threads
    103
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steve focus point is just center and slightly low (actually touching)right eye as viewed. could this be motion blur by the subject possibly from him eating/chewing rather than TV Steve? Mate i'm not on any level saying i'm not at fault,but i've got a pretty steady rest to work off at this hide,so in theory at least the camera should be reasonably stable,this might also explain the coat being sharper?? Steve in your repost WB is different yours being more muted,did you use the eye dropper for this if so where did you place it to take the reading please?

    Rachel sadly, your post confirms what Steve has said,thanks for the help mate. I can't really use any form of support here Rachel other than a bean bag type senario,the seat underlies the rest at the bottom of the hide "window". But although I will always look at myself for errors first as with my question to Steve I do wonder if this is motion blur of the subject rather than camera shake persay??? i'm unsure Rachel it could well be me,shutter control is something i've been trying to improve upon, and although this wasn't that long ago for me it's an age as i'm getting more familiar with my camera all the time .

    many thanks both

    Stu

    PS Steve no sharpening applied just the fine detail selection in DPP(picture style) which does effect USM I've noted.
    Last edited by Stuart Philpott; 03-20-2016 at 11:22 AM. Reason: PS

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Nagpur, India
    Posts
    3,837
    Threads
    245
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Stu -- I agree with the above comments , and i think you will certainly improve more after these suggestions , soft images just takes out the life from portraits in most most cases , Steve's RP makes this look much better . TFS !

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Lincolnshire UK.
    Posts
    4,951
    Threads
    187
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Stu,softness issue well dealt with ans agree Steve's repost lifts it a lot ,did wonder if maybe a little drop in contrast just on the bg might lift it a bit more,just my personal thought of course.It's a smashing looking Deer for you to work on and well done getting the shot.

    Keith.

  9. #9
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,017
    Threads
    2,604
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well caught Stu,my first reaction was that is was soft.
    (Steve has done a little magic on it and the sharpness doesn't look far off at all, I think he has also tweaked the background - it looks pretty good suggest have a word with him)

  10. #10
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,906
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Stu i like the portrait of this small deer species , so well done in getting this .
    Lovely warm colors if they have been that warm ? Wonder what WB you have chosen in DPP . This image is again a good example that one needs PS for further fine tuning the image and the shortcomings of DPP !!!!!
    You need to make localized adjustments many times , so PS i the way to go , or you could try to use GIMP ..... better than nothing in the end .

    But get out and practice .... Steve has summed it up nicely .

    BTW Steveīs RP does look good to me

    TFS Andreas

  11. #11
    Story Sequences Moderator and Wildlife Moderator Gabriela Plesea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    7,738
    Threads
    455
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hello Stu,

    I am so sorry to rub it in, but I have to repeat what has already been said: despite the good framing and lovely warmth, the subject appears too soft for my liking. Did you have any support when you were capturing this?

    1/200s is just not enough, try obtain a SS that is at least equal to the size of your lens. If the subject is moving - or likely to move - then you must play it safe and aim for say, 1/1000s. Steve's RP a great improvement indeed, but there's only so much one can do if the subject isn't sharp enough.

    I am trying to imagine the hide you were shooting from, Stu. Not sure I understand your circumstances, but how about using a monopod? Or a home-made beanbag that you can mould and shape?

    Keep practicing, I am sure you'll get it right I am hoping for more images after the week-end:)

    Kind regards,
    Gabriela Plesea

  12. #12
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,179
    Threads
    103
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Folks please can I thank you all as a collective rather than individually,i'm very tired and have little time,Andreas,i'm set on getting ps in some form for sure.It's just so little time i'll barely touch it at the moment.
    Gabriela don't worry your not rubbing it in,it is incredibly important that I learn how to judge sharpness... it's not harsh for me at all Ahh kiddo I value your honesty,you are trying to help me


    Guys I would say i'm concerned by this ,as I'm worried I didn't see this,not whether an image in particular isn't sharp I'm very concerned that I thought it was ok. Sharpness I guess is subjective but this image means I need to look harder at how I judge this.

    cheers for the honest replies folks,I'd rather know than not!!!!

    take care

    Stu

  13. #13
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Stu, you just simply needed more SS and DoF.

    Shooting in more 'open' light as I said will help you. Sadly shooting in the UK, light is of a premium and so there are some concessions we have to make in getting shots, but as the Equinox has just passed, days will be longer, brighter and more opportunities.

  14. #14
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,179
    Threads
    103
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Stu, you just simply needed more SS and DoF.

    Shooting in more 'open' light as I said will help you. Sadly shooting in the UK, light is of a premium and so there are some concessions we have to make in getting shots, but as the Equinox has just passed, days will be longer, brighter and more opportunities.
    Steve I understand I need more SS and DOF, as I opened with this was taken back in sept,I've had a LOT of help since then,

    What is bothering me is I thought it was sharp on my viewing the image and obviously it's not. Buddy I don't want to stray from topic,trying really hard , but I need to re evaluate my conception of sharpness. That is what I'm trying to say.


    Ahh mate I've had my camera in my grubby mits more in the last two weeks than for months tis all good mate,I'm loving it.It's been a hard dull winter here for togs especially those grafting like moi. But I'm full of optimism mate for the months ahead,please worry not on that score. I get what you are saying with "open light",but deer in woodland have a special appeal. Much to learn buddy

    I won't go further,but will say cheers for the help

    take care mate

    Stu

  15. #15
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Stu, there is Input sharpening, then there is Output sharpening.

    Your issue is the 'Output sharpening' which is Perceptual sharpening i.e. sharpening something to look sharp. Normally I would say send me the RAW, I can then provide a better reply, but I think if you were to try and forward the file via Dropbox then you may get into a right 2 & 8. Email could be an issue, but you could try, but it must be the RAW, NOT the Tiff. Let me know.

  16. #16
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,179
    Threads
    103
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Stu, there is Input sharpening, then there is Output sharpening.

    Your issue is the 'Output sharpening' which is Perceptual sharpening i.e. sharpening something to look sharp. Normally I would say send me the RAW, I can then provide a better reply, but I think if you were to try and forward the file via Dropbox then you may get into a right 2 & 8. Email could be an issue, but you could try, but it must be the RAW, NOT the Tiff. Let me know.
    Steve I'll shoot you a pm

    many thanks for all this,never taken for granted Steve !!!!!!!!

    best

    Stu

  17. #17
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,906
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steve & Stuart as long as Stu is limited to DPP there is no such In or output sharpening , as DPPis limited to one time sharpening due to its structure .... sadly .
    Basically you can apply input sharpening and thatīs it , well for me . The other issue is that you cannot apply the sharpening selectively within DPP , only workaround is to make two versions and blend them together in PS , again a bit clunky .But works for me though , just takes a tiny bit more time .

    Hope this helps folks

  18. #18
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,179
    Threads
    103
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andreas Liedmann View Post
    Steve & Stuart as long as Stu is limited to DPP there is no such In or output sharpening , as DPPis limited to one time sharpening due to its structure .... sadly .
    Basically you can apply input sharpening and thatīs it , well for me . The other issue is that you cannot apply the sharpening selectively within DPP , only workaround is to make two versions and blend them together in PS , again a bit clunky .But works for me though , just takes a tiny bit more time .

    Hope this helps folks
    Cheers Andreas,everything helps my friend. Andreas,although I'm not quite there yet,when PS comes these little things like Steve's post are all helping me assimilate some basic steps to use later on.Sure I can't use them yet,but soon hopefully.

    Huge thanks as always Andreas

    best

    Stu

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics