Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Female Northern Flicker - C & C Please

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    11
    Threads
    5
    Thank You Posts

    Default Female Northern Flicker - C & C Please

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    • Location: My yard in North San Diego County



    • Species: Northern Flicker (Female), wild, no attraction methods used



    • Time of day/Weather: Mid afternoon, sunny



    • Camera Body: Canon EOS 7D Mark II



    • Lens: Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM, zoomed to 400mm



    • ISO: 200



    • Shutter Speed: 1/1000




    • Aperature: f/5.6






    • Focus: Center point, back button focus



    • Hand Held



    • Crop: Yes



    • DPP 4.0: minor brightness and highlight adjustments (+/-1), sharpness (3), and NR (4,4)



    • Photoshop: none


  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Euclid, Ohio
    Posts
    1,031
    Threads
    188
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Looks like you did fine on the exposure...maybe brighten it up just a tad.
    The head angle is fine. You did fine with the catch light in the eye.

    The bird does look soft. I'd sharpen that a little more...just the bird.

    From an 'art' perspective, the background isn't to desirable due to all the
    branches, with the major distraction being the branches "growing" from
    the Flicker's head.

    You could probably lessen the distraction by performing a vertical crop
    on the Flicker. I would start the crop on the right side of the Flicker where
    the first branch is going up. Then crop on the left and either the first or second
    vertical branch. After that you could probably do some cloning by getting rid
    of some of the left over branches, which would clean up the background a lot.

    Doug

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    1
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Over all a nice shot. I am not too concerned about the branches 'growing out of it's head'. To me in that regard, it is clearly a bird among the branches.

    Based on the body and lens combination I would be slightly disappointed at the sharpness. It is a little soft, the camera seems to have just missed tack sharp focus. Not too difficult to add a touch more sharpness. The level of cropping may also be playing a part, I have no idea how far you were from the bird.

    Under the same shooting conditions I would have been at ISO 640 f/6.3-8.0 and the corresponding higher shutter. Less chance of tiny amounts of camera shake, and away from wide open.

    This shot would definitely be in my keeper pile.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    11
    Threads
    5
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback so far. I wasn't pleased with the sharpness either and I will work on that. The distance was approx. 40 yards, so I had to crop it big time.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    11
    Threads
    5
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mick - are you suggesting that using a smaller aperture helps minimize camera shake?

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A nice opportunity but the bird is soft. That body and lens can give excellent sharpness, and even wide open at 400mm it should be very good. There are many issues that can degrade sharpness. If it isn't excellent to start with, a big crop can reveal softness, and noise reduction will cause softening. It's hard to tell from a JPEG but it looks like missed focus may be a contributing issue here, too. The center point has invisible helper points and if it is a big crop it's possible it hit one of the branches. And the camera can focus slightly differently with subsequent shots that should be identical otherwise. I try to shoot several, with a re-focus each time, in hopes one will be better.

    Your shutter speed should be good if your hand holding technique is good. Palm under the lens on the zoom ring, not touching the focus ring, elbows tight against your sides, camera pressed against your forehead, and a steady stance.

    I prefer to use "silent shutter" mode unless I need the fastest burst speed for action, in the hope that it might give a little less mirror shake. I have never seen it claimed that it would matter at our normal shutter speeds, and haven't tested it, but no harm in trying everything I can.

    Keep working on it -- would love to see more!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics