Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Kingfisher

  1. #1
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,015
    Threads
    2,604
    Thank You Posts

    Default Kingfisher

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Camera Model Canon EOS 7D
    Shooting Mode Aperture-Priority AE
    Tv(Shutter Speed) 1/640
    Av(Aperture Value) 5.6
    Metering Mode Partial Metering
    Exposure Compensation -2/3
    ISO Speed 400
    Auto ISO Speed OFF
    Lens EF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
    Focal Length 400.0mm
    Flash Type External Flash : E-TTL flash metering
    E-TTL II flash metering Evaluative flash metering
    Flash Exposure Compensation -1
    Shutter curtain sync Hi-speed
    This is a shot from 2012 that I have resurrected, I thought it looked a little different to most kingfishers on a stick, the lighting was quite tricky at the time.

    All C&C welcome.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,065
    Threads
    1,300
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    very nice looks a little ethereal

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Lincolnshire UK.
    Posts
    4,951
    Threads
    187
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jon the bird looks a tad soft but I do like what you where trying to do with this shot considering the lighting that you describe, if you don't try you don't get!, nice different shot.

    Keith.

  4. #4
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,549
    Threads
    1,284
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jon, I like the light in this one, but have to agree with Keith, it is soft, however I appreciate it's from 2012. Would clone that highlight bottom RHC.

    TFS
    Steve

  5. #5
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brussels, Belgium
    Posts
    1,106
    Threads
    116
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jon,
    The flash brings out the colours very nicely, especially the bright blue on the back. I'm not sure the movement on the wings really works for me, but it is a pleasing image none-the-less.
    Would I be right thinking that this is quite a young bird?

    Best wishes, Gerald

  6. #6
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,015
    Threads
    2,604
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Here is a rework, the focal point is almost touching the eye, I have used a slightly different sharpening regime here. Better or am I flogging a dead horse?
    Here I used USM in DPP at 4, 2, 5 as opposed to Sharpen 3 I also used DLO.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Lincolnshire UK.
    Posts
    4,951
    Threads
    187
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jon think it would be hard to get perfection, but I like what you are trying to do, it's great that we all have views and opinions I like the blurred wings.


    Keith.

  8. #8
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,549
    Threads
    1,284
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jon, I think it is better, but is the RAW 'critically' sharp, as at this size you can make anything look good, but it's the RAW that counts as you know.

    No idea about DPP settings, all 'Greek' to me, I would ask Arash or Andreas.

    Sorry can help much on this one.

  9. #9
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,015
    Threads
    2,604
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks everyone, yes the eye is sharp, the feathers are blurred in certain areas.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics