Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Is there an ugly bird contest somewhere?

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default Is there an ugly bird contest somewhere?

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I hadn't had a chance to shoot birds since the Osprey fledged, then in the last 3 days I've had three good sessions with different birds. Will get back in the swing here, I hope -- been busy. But before I post some slightly more serious images, I couldn't resist this one. This guy is right up there with the entrants in the ugly dog contests we see at county fairs. I'm not even sure what it is, but guessing a juvenile Great-tailed Grackle.

    Canon 7D2, 600 f/4 II + 1.4X III, big Gitzo with Wimberley II, ISO 800, 1/320 at f/10. Horizontal cropped at the sides and just a little from the top. Just very basic adjustments in LR. No getting lower here -- the sewer pond police wouldn't like it.

  2. #2
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Diane:

    He seems pretty self confident despite the tattered plumage. Effective composition, nicely exposed.

    The background bokeh seems just a bit busy. A larger f/stop would have helped, but perhaps you were set up for a different scenario than this fellow.

    It is always good to keep an eye out for the nonconventional bird shots!

    Randy
    MY BPN ALBUMS

    "Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Pune, Maharashtra, India
    Posts
    7,409
    Threads
    469
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent image in habitat. Very nice inquisitive pose. I like the feather details and him too,nice colours.
    Well, I will not call him ugly. This is just a phase in his life.

    Regards,
    Satish.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks, guys! Here's a closer crop -- I do hope it's just a teenager awkwardness thing. I've found that with that much magnification (840mm) that stopping down a little helps keep more of the bird in focus, especially helpful for actively foraging ones such as I had this day. A close BG, as from this angle, is pretty ugly even wide open. Would love to get a lower angle but not possible here. On a more serious image I'd remove the specular highlights.

    BTW, this is cropped down to 13%of the original frame -- not bad for the 7D2 at ISO 800. Did just a touch of NR on this one, though, just on the BG.
    Last edited by Diane Miller; 09-13-2015 at 08:59 AM.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    385
    Threads
    139
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well if beauty is skin deep this fellow is inside out ....not the prettiest but interesting

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    81
    Threads
    5
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Haha, poor guy! Nice photo, Diane. I love it! Thanks for sharing!


    Mike

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Manchester, CT
    Posts
    52
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Definitely an ugly bird! I know at this magnification ratio the DOF gets razor thin wide open but I was thinking that the lack of sharpness could be because the lens is not calibrated properly or having issues focusing like some of the early 7DIIs. Just a thought. FoCal should tell you either way. TFS! Could be my imagination but it looks a tiny bit front focused to me.

    John

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member Ákos Lumnitzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,560
    Threads
    71
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Uh! What a cutie! NOT!
    Nicely thought out image.
    I prefer the OP.
    The RP that is tighter is noticeably noisy due to the severity of the crop.
    TFS!

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Funny title!
    Agree 100% with Randy's critique.
    BG a bit busy. IQ on the bird is very ggod.
    Good choice of comp.
    Gail

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I hope it's obvious this wasn't posted as a serious image -- I just couldn't resist getting a shot of this bird. BG and noise were not good, of course, but no choice was possible to minimize them. The crop is just to show more clearly the poor thing's appearance.

    But what is it -- a juvenile Great-tailed Grackle? Isn't it late for a juvenile with such early development of feathers? (Just shot a few days ago.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics