Osprey fishing.
This is a composite image, the background being a separate file.
I hope it is OK with you.
Thanks for looking.
Canon 1D Mark IV
Canon 500 f4.0 L IS II.
ISO 800
f4.5
1/2000 s
HH.
Osprey fishing.
This is a composite image, the background being a separate file.
I hope it is OK with you.
Thanks for looking.
Canon 1D Mark IV
Canon 500 f4.0 L IS II.
ISO 800
f4.5
1/2000 s
HH.
Beautiful bird, clear detail and interesting POV Karl! Not sure why you had to change the BG but this works for me!
Terrific dorsal view with great light and wonderful feather detail. I wouldn't have known about the background, except that it seems more fitting for a Harrier. I might have expected something watery blue. The bg seems to have just a hint of posterization, which is a problem I have from time to time.
Great dorsal view but I knew right away when I viewed it that it was a composite even before reading your comments.
The osprey looks great though.
I can tell because of "the cut-out look" and perfect edges. The way around it is to "feather" your selection by 3 pixels or so when pasting it onto the composite BG.
Go to selection- then modify then feather.
Gail
I felt I should post the image as it was taken.
Just had some fun with the background.
Which one do you like if any.
Thanks.
Not everyone likes high-key images, but I do, so this looks pretty cool to me. I'd just add a 1px border around it.
Nice dorsal view Karl.
I prefer the original sky (unaltered)
I prefer the original image too. No need to change anything like a BG IMHO.
Nicely done Karl (the original shot).
TFS
I much prefer the original. Super diving pose with a great look at the top side.
Original for me Karl. Fab look at the topside of the bird. Nice detail.
Will
Excellent flight shot. Beautiful colours, great topside view with nice details. I like the both posts.
Regards,
Satish.
Karl:
I vote for the original sky as well. Great dorsal view.
I have seen thousands of osprey, and this one seems unusually brow, vs the gray,brown I normally see. There certainly can be regional variations, but if you bumped up the saturation, I think it went too far.
Cheers
Randy