Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Barn swallow

  1. #1
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,338
    Threads
    2,666
    Thank You Posts

    Default Barn swallow

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hand held Canon 1DX Canon 100-400L IS II ISO 1600 1/3200 sec f5.6
    Had a great time shooting these little guys they are pretty darned quick! Hoping for a better chance in stronger light and will try with the 500mm to reduce cropping.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Lincolnshire UK.
    Posts
    4,951
    Threads
    187
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very good try Jonathan, bird certainly made a splash, look forward to your next effort.

    Keith.

  3. #3
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jon, great fun and it appears you are getting your eye in on this too, not the easiest of subjects. Get that ISO up to around 3200, then try. I might try a CW rotation say around 2.6 and add some Vib/Sat/Brightness just to lift it a bit, or better via HSL. Then subject to the IQ a 16x9 crop, you will still retain the expanse of room but it's just 'tighter'????

    TFS
    Steve

  4. #4
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,338
    Threads
    2,666
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Keith & Steve, yes the light was very changeable, I did take exposures at 3200 and 2500, I have some more but the subject is a tad small in the frame - I also did some 16:9, will review then post another, hope the light picks up next week then try with the 500mm.

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Certainly Jonathan, the 500 would be better, but perhaps less 'manoeuvrable/flexible', do you have a 300? I hope the light picks up for you next week, good luck. As you said, these guys are fast, hence looking at 1/3200-4000 sec.

  6. #6
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,338
    Threads
    2,666
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Certainly Jonathan, the 500 would be better, but perhaps less 'manoeuvrable/flexible', do you have a 300? I hope the light picks up for you next week, good luck. As you said, these guys are fast, hence looking at 1/3200-4000 sec.
    300 wouldn't be long enough Steve, I was working on 400mm and this was too short, the 500 will be tough but you never get something for nothing

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    DOH, yep your right didn't think, as I was also thinking about a faster lens too, f/2.8, but even with a 1.4 your not far off the 100-400, but still faster.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics