Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Great Crested Flycatcher

  1. #1
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default Great Crested Flycatcher

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I had picked out a hopeful spot at a clearing in the woods for a warbler, and was waiting patiently when this Great Crested Flycatcher flew in and posed for a few seconds. Certainly I would have preferred not to have the leaf over the body, but I don't think it intrudes too much. Not a species I've photographed often. (The warbler came ten minutes later.)

    D7200, 500f4 + 1.4 TC, ISO 800, 1/1000s @ f/7.1 manual

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A beautiful bird indeed. Love the clear eye. Cannot fault the IQ and fieldcraft but...I am not loving this one Bill.
    The bird is on the wrong side of the stick and I find it takes away from the image.
    Could you have moved to the left to get rid of all the stuff in the BG on the LHS of the frame?I would clone out the vertical OOF grey branch.
    Man oh man, I am picky tonight!!

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    8,509
    Threads
    827
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great bird to have, nicely done, Bill.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Bill, love the sharp head, and the way the outline of the top leaf, follows the curve of the head. Im fine with the OOF foliage in the BG, but having a complete smooth BG would have taken this up a few notches.

  5. #5
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks all. Gail is right of course (as usual). I was so excited to get a sharp image of the species that I posted it without taking a step back and critically evaluating the image. Still, I'm glad I got him. Here's a repost with the left hand oof foliage removed. I'm not sure which I like better. The repost shows some posterization, some of which also shows in the OP, and which I assume crept in during the jpeg conversion. If anyone as a suggestion for how to remove, or avoid, this, please let me know.

  6. #6
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I wasn't happy with the repost, so I tried another approach in this second repost. There is still some posterization that I see on my screen at certain viewing angles. Thanks for looking.

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member Ákos Lumnitzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,560
    Threads
    71
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I get excited too, believe me I do. It's hard to not be excited and to focus on all the different parameters that create strong images.
    I like it, but it's not one of your stronger images I've seen lately.
    The last repost is probably the best for me. I know not a lot could've been done about the damaged leaves as it was unlikely a set-up, but they really distract for me.

    Thanks for sharing. :)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics