Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Otter With Fish

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Norfolk. UK
    Posts
    915
    Threads
    208
    Thank You Posts

    Default Otter With Fish

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    First post in this section of the forum. I usually photograph birds and was out this morning when my attention was taken by an otter eating a large fish on the opposite bank of the river but too far away to make a worthwhile image. Soon a second otter appeared on the bank an dived into the river to fish. I watched this otter for some time as it surfaced an dived, but was always too far away. I then spent some time photographing a passing Heron when I noticed a line of bubbles moving towards me and knew that it was an otter, and by a stroke of absolute luck it surfaced just in front of me, fish in mouth. I think the story here is that the otters have a nest with young and this fish was being taken to feed them.

    Canon 7D Mk 2 : !00-400 L Mk 2.

    1/1250 @ f 6.3 : ISO 800

    Thanks for looking.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Norfolk. UK
    Posts
    915
    Threads
    208
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Something seems to have gone awry with the colour balance in the conversion. Here is a re-post. Hope this looks better.Name:  _Z5A4961.jpg
Views: 53
Size:  396.3 KB

  3. #3
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi David, I've only seen these in Scotland either on Mull or up in the Shetlands, but never this close, 100-400, you are extremely lucky.

    I quite like the position in frame, especially the bow wave and trailing bubbles behind, the small fish with a glimpse of the tail is a real bonus. I would look more at 1600 or 2000+ for SS as these are quick. The RP is slightly better, but overall the colours does look off, not quite right. To me the image looks/appears to be flooded with a lot of blue, the highlights are slightly clipped. I might suggest if you have the time, revisit the original RAW, try to get a more 'neutral WB', then balance the Exp, i.e. highlights, lights, darks & shadows, this should provided a good platform, if you do have the urge to apply some saturation, be sparing.

    I had a quick look and to me the image is more 'monochromatic' with little vibrant colour and the colours more subdued/muted, but you were there.

    Hope you get some more images in the future and are able to share too. Don't forget to add your thoughts to other images within the Forum, it's a great way to learn.

    TFS
    Steve

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi David - Welcome to the Wildlife Forum! I love the fish sticking out of the mouth and all those whiskers. The rp does look better than the op. As usual, Steve has given excellent advice for getting the most out of the image. I too am looking forward to seeing more wildlife images from you.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Norfolk. UK
    Posts
    915
    Threads
    208
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Rachel and Steve, thanks for your comments. Steve, thanks for valuable advice. I have been back to the original RAW file and have tried to be a little more understanding of the original capture and a little less enthusiastic on the sliders. Here is a re-post.Name:  _Z5A4961.jpg
Views: 29
Size:  385.9 KB

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    David - IMHO the rp is a huge improvement but what is important is what you think!

    TFS,
    Rachel

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi David, I think that's better, perhaps a little 'saturated' but you have a better handle on the overall colours/situation. I was going more 'muted', however I like the hint of blue you have in the water, gives a bit more life. It looks as if you have change the crop and gone in tighter, therefore the IQ I feel has suffered a little. Hope this thread has been of help and you can progress more otter shots, the Avian images look good BTW. I'm sure Rachel will chime in to after this.

    Cheers
    Steve

  8. #8
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Spooky Rachel, posting at the same time!

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yes spooky Steve. David - I agree with Steve that the wider crop held up better. So much of processing such as warmth and color is subjective to some extent. We all have our preferences in how we process an image and whether we are trying to achieve a shot representative of what we actually saw or a shot more pleasing to more viewers.

    Rachel

  10. #10
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nicely put Rachel. I think David like all of this you need to quietly distill from all the feedback.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics