-
Lifetime Member
-
Lifetime Member
-
Wildlife Moderator
What was your 'original' vision when capturing the image Rachel, what did you want to convey in it and why? Just trying to get an understanding/thinking behind the image.
-
Lifetime Member
Hi Steve - my original vision is the top version which is very close to what I actually saw. I wanted to show the vastness of the thermal features and Yellowstone but also show a bit of the "hardships." This is also a case where smell-o-vision would enhance the experience because you would get some of the sulfur smell of the thermal features.
Thanks,
Rachel
-
BPN Member
Hi Rachel i understand your point being as close as possible what you saw in Yellowstone , but as long as we have just a 2D image to look at and no sound/smell is included i prefer the RP for its tonal depth and more visible detail , plus the crop is working better . Still think the subject is too small in the frame ,i guess the reason for my thinking is that the landscape is not that much attractive for my eyes to be honest . I like the overall colors and tone in RP , likewise the detail you have extracted .
TFS Andreas
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Lifetime Member
Thanks Andreas and Dale. Andreas - somehow I knew you would have a strong preference for the processing of the 2nd version.
I understand your point about the small in frame.
Dale - thanks for the crop suggestion. The pano does improve it and I'm not sure why I didn't think of it because I never really liked the fg of the edge of the thermal run-off.
Thanks again,
Rachel
-
BPN Member
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Wildlife Moderator
Hi Rachel, thanks for the explanation. I think Dale's RP takes it to where it needs to be, the crop works beautifully with nice placement of the subject. The depth of colour in your RP certainly helps, but the ratio of subject to landscape now works and makes for a lovely image.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Lifetime Member
Hi Rachel
I like Dale's RP the most, but the artistic side is not my strong point....
Maybe because my eye does not wonder to find an anchor point, looking for some detail- rule of thirds, golden spiral etc...
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Hi Rachel. I like the RP by Dale. I can imagine the sights and smells of the place. Would love to visit there sometime.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Story Sequences Moderator and Wildlife Moderator
Dearest Rachel,
Should I be able to see this beautiful place with my own eyes, I would certainly go for the OP:) As first time viewer of this image "on screen", I will choose your RP as well as Dale's RP. I do prefer the crop in Dale's RP.
For some reason the camera cannot replicate precisely that which the eye sees - maybe it is because of the mood and atmosphere Andreas was talking about, which our photographic equipment cannot capture - for this is something one has to experience and "feel", and sometimes photography alone cannot do that. We often think we have done all the work by taking a photograph and derive extreme pleasure from a certain place...later when processing frustration creeps in because we realise that, in order to make others appreciate it, some interference in terms of PP work is needed to make them "see" what we saw.
I believe this is the case here - you have a stunningly beautiful landscape with a solitary bison in it, yet the frame is not as effective "as taken" - it needed some "tweaks" to enhance our sensitivity and help us viewers "possess" the beauty of this place.
I really enjoyed this post and comments, as well as your RP and Dale's - an interesting exercise and it made me understand my own dilemma about some KTP images of animals engulfed in dust clouds - I think I now know how to process them:)
Thank you so much Rachel, once again I realise how much I have to gain by visiting this Forum every evening - so much to learn, and I will never know enough:)
Warmest regards,
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
BPN Member
I like this, Rachel! I do prefer the tones of your RP and Dale's crop though.
Perhaps something between your OP and RP for tonal depth is best to stay true to what you wanted to convey but still "Grab" the viewer sufficiently?
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Lifetime Member
Thanks everyone. I'm glad this thread provoked some discussion.
-
Hi Rachel , i also liked the second version of yours along with Dale's version. such a beautiful image . and very well said by Gabriela .
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Lifetime Member
Another vote for the RP here and Dale's crop as well has improved upon that composition wise.
It was good to see the comparisons between your two images Rachel and shows the contrast/colour/clarity boost very well.
TFS
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks