Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: ghost brant--a "pleasing blur" ?

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Ladner,B.C.
    Posts
    667
    Threads
    110
    Thank You Posts

    Default ghost brant--a "pleasing blur" ?

    Name:  medium blurred brant.jpg
Views: 151
Size:  83.6 KBI was just on the verge of trashing this image ( the original of which is way overexposed and badly focussed ) , and several in the same sequence, but stopped, wondering why I liked it. I pushed the highlights and exposure even further and that cinched it. After mulling it over for a while I realized that it personified my mental image of brant as a ghost bird of the seas. They are a good size black bird with a body about the size of a mallard and a wingspan of a small goose and yet they can materialize out of nowhere when you are lying watching for them at water level. They are amazing flyers, with the ability to tuck in their wings and accelerate like an F15 and manoeuvre like swallows, or to cup those big wings and sail across in front of you like a flight of kites. This shot was taken as I stood out in the open in a receding tide on Boundary Bay.
    5D MIII,EF 400 f4 DO IS;ISO 1000,f/16,1/90,0 EV: PP in Aperture
    Last edited by Bob Smith; 01-15-2015 at 05:20 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Grass Valley, CA
    Posts
    287
    Threads
    26
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I do know a little about brant and you do having something here. I would really like to see how it looks with the middle bird cloned out. I think just the right and left bird might create a "better" image. In my view the middle bird cuts into the right bird too much.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,553
    Threads
    1,320
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Bob, this one isn't working for me, the birds are all flying away from us and the image is very noisy. For motion blurs I personally like to have at least the head/eye reasonably sharp and clear with a more interesting BG to create a watercolor-like effect

    TFS hope you get a better one next time
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I think this is really quite interesting, and especially for a salvage job. It might be more appreciated in OOTB. I really like that the three birds all have different lightness. The merge of the middle one would probably be a negative factor for a straight image, but I think you get artistic license here. Same for the noise. I don't know if you did NR but might get away with some as there isn't a lot sharp to worry about blurring. But you don't want to lower the subtle feather detail in the underside of that right wing.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Ladner,B.C.
    Posts
    667
    Threads
    110
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you for all the input here----you've really made me think hard about this image and it's various aspects. Willie, I thought I had an answer to your problem with the overlapping birds in the previous shot. That had the three birds nicely separated but upon pondering I realized why I had rejected it earlier----on the closest (r hand ) of the three the right wing is up so that it looks only 1/2 the full length. Personally I rather like the current positioning anyway as it evokes the weaving pattern of flight of a brant flock. Arash,while I'm sure an incoming shot would have it's merits, it would clash with the ghost theme I have in my mind in that the impression would be one of coming closer and more into thName:  blurred brant w- ripples.jpg
Views: 34
Size:  202.2 KBe realm of a clearer presence as opposed to a "ghostly disappearance" into the sea mist. I tried to get out what detail I could uncover and the best I could find was the wing detail pointed out by Dianne and, I think, there is visible just the merest glint of a spark in the left eye. As to the background I did play with that, taking the water ripples from clearly there throughout to a totally whited out look ( in which I can definitely see the left eye) . Each view was pleasing to me and so the one I selected was I suppose my "artistic" preference but the two sides of what you see here would, I think, be equally valid artistically and in fact I myself might choose one or the other or the other on any given day. I've attached here the version with ripples to see if this is what you had in mind.

  6. Thanks WillieHall thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics