Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 7D II vs 5D III image files

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Northamptonshire, UK
    Posts
    451
    Threads
    152
    Thank You Posts

    Default 7D II vs 5D III image files

    Hi, there may be a technical reason but when I view 7D II images in DPP 4 they don't seem as sharp as similar files from the 5D III when viewed at 100%. I've captured images on a 600mm F4 II and 1.4x III and 5D files look much sharper.

    is it because of the nature of the 7D files or is there another reason?

    ive still not nailed a BIF shot yet on the 7D II but can nail everyone on the 5D. Any ideas?

  2. #2
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,556
    Threads
    1,321
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yes, the files from the cameras with small pixels are softer than those with larger pixels when viewed at 100% for a number of reasons. The quality of the low-pass filter on the 7D2 is also not as good as higher end bodies.
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    250
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arash_hazeghi View Post
    Yes, the files from the cameras with small pixels are softer than those with larger pixels when viewed at 100% for a number of reasons.
    So any way to overcome, or are we, users of the Mk II, just stuck with softer photos?

  4. #4
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,556
    Threads
    1,321
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Thompson View Post
    So any way to overcome, or are we, users of the Mk II, just stuck with softer photos?
    When you view them at 100% it will always look a bit softer and less crisp, no matter what you do but if you are shooting from the same distance you do get more pixels on the subject so you can down sample the image and make it looks sharp by sharpening....
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    250
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arash_hazeghi View Post
    When you view them at 100% it will always look a bit softer and less crisp, no matter what you do but if you are shooting from the same distance you do get more pixels on the subject so you can down sample the image and make it looks sharp by sharpening....
    It's becoming obvious to me that I need to upgrade my processing skills along with a camera upgrade. Any suggestions for where to start with reading to help with that? I am considering switching to DPP for processing. If I do, then I will invest in you and Artie's guide for that. But processing in general, any suggestions.

    Thanks

  6. #6
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,556
    Threads
    1,321
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Thompson View Post
    It's becoming obvious to me that I need to upgrade my processing skills along with a camera upgrade. Any suggestions for where to start with reading to help with that? I am considering switching to DPP for processing. If I do, then I will invest in you and Artie's guide for that. But processing in general, any suggestions.

    Thanks
    Hi Don,

    The most critical step in post processing is the RAW conversion. If you can generate a clean, sharp TIFF file, your work after that is easy. In my (and Artie's ;) opinion, the best way to arrive at this result is DPP4.After conversion, I typically put the bird on a separate layer, then clean up the BG if needed then use bi-cubic down-sample in PS and finally apply gentle smart sharpening to the bird only

    best,
    Arash
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics