Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: GBH Portrait

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Camas, Washington
    Posts
    98
    Threads
    16
    Thank You Posts

    Default GBH Portrait

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Ridgefield Wildlife Preserve. This one just about would let me lean out of the car and pet him.

    Canon 50D, 70-200 2.8L II @260mm, cropped (75% of full frame)
    1/100, f/13, ISO 800 in Manual mode
    Background dodge/burn, Surface blur, Gaussian Blur, NR, sharpened bird in PS CS5.1
    Eye work, adjustment brush to adjust shadows and highlights on bird in LR4

  2. #2
    Forum Participant Iain Barker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Lancashire, England
    Posts
    712
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jon

    Nice portrait with a good head angle and nice detail. I wonder if more sharpening would be an improvement did you sharpen the final file or before your final export?
    To me I feel as though i am looking down on the bird slightly. Could you have got slightly lower? Also on you setting I think you could have got away with a larger aperture and still had the whole head within the DOF. This would have allowed a higher shutter speed as 1/100 seems a little low.

    Iain

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Camas, Washington
    Posts
    98
    Threads
    16
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iain Barker View Post
    Hi Jon

    Nice portrait with a good head angle and nice detail. I wonder if more sharpening would be an improvement did you sharpen the final file or before your final export?
    To me I feel as though i am looking down on the bird slightly. Could you have got slightly lower? Also on you setting I think you could have got away with a larger aperture and still had the whole head within the DOF. This would have allowed a higher shutter speed as 1/100 seems a little low.

    Iain
    I used LR for export sizing and sharpening. I believe it was set for normal, I can try the high setting to see if I like it better, or go more aggressive in PS USM. I did not want the neck feathers to get crunchy.

    I was as low as I could get (in the car--Acura sedan, shooting out the lowered window), I was seeing how close I could get, which automatically increased the shooting angle as I got closer. I was surprised how close I was able to get, which is why I started shooting portraits. During the non-summer months, this particular reserve does not allow visitors to leave their car.

    The softness in the lower beak is because of movement (opening/closing). I've found that herons can remain so perfectly still that if I have the lens supported via bean bag or even just the car door with a jacket/blanket I can get sharp focus at 1/100. I took 30 or so frames, and about 20 of them were sharp. This was the sharpest with an open beak.

    I was about 15 feet from the subject, f/8 is .24 feet (3 inches), f/13 is .4 feet (4.8 inches), I was concerned the tip of the beak would be out of focus if I opened much more.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I love head shots like this and herons and egrets have such interesting faces. Good thinking on the shooting specs.

    My only thought is that there is something of a blue/magenta cast on the bird. Adjusting WB might make the warmer tones too warm, but sometimes using Hue-Sat or Selective Color on the blue and/or magenta channel will neutralize things nicely -- or just mask a global WB change to the bird if it makes the BG too overpowering.

  5. Thanks Jon Pugmire thanked for this post
  6. #5
    Forum Participant Iain Barker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Lancashire, England
    Posts
    712
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It is more the area around the eye that I think might be able to be sharpened a little more, Possibly by doing it selectively in photoshop. Also when I mentioned your setting this was more of a general comment as I agree that in this image you have done well to freeze most of the movement at 1/100th. I do wonder if the slight lack of detail around the eye is caused by movement of the fine feathers. Related to this it is also worth keeping in mind that on a crop sensor cameras you will start to get refraction at aperatures smaller than f11 and your image will start to lose sharpness.
    Overall this is a very nice image and my comments are only minor points. It will be good to see some other comments on the sharpness from more the experienced members.

  7. Thanks Jon Pugmire thanked for this post
  8. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Camas, Washington
    Posts
    98
    Threads
    16
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    RP, slightly adjustments to white balance, re-sharpened.

  9. #7
    Forum Participant Iain Barker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Lancashire, England
    Posts
    712
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the repost and think you have improved the sharpness around the eye. Especially around the small feathers.

  10. Thanks Jon Pugmire thanked for this post
  11. #8
    BPN Member Jim Keener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Idyllwild, California
    Posts
    499
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jon, I like the intimacy shown in your photograph. And can imagine how excited you might have been. I agree with Iain's comments about the repost. Beautiful image.

  12. Thanks Jon Pugmire thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics