Lovely shot Kerry, very nice to see both the pair together, especially with the opposing wing positions. I find the background interesting and the angle they are flying is good. One minor technical nit from me is the whites on the drakes neck look a little hot (disclaimer - looking on my laptop at the moment!)
Thanks Mike! The Firefox histogram tool shows no pixels over 200 in the image, so I think it's because there's very little detail in that white area of the neck.
"It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera... they are made with the eye, heart, and head." - Henri Cartier Bresson
Hi Kerry, lovely pair in flight with excellent details and sharpness. What is in the BG? I find the BG is a little distracting, but there isn't anything you could do about it since you were already at f5.6. Loi
Hi Kerry, lovely image. The background is a tad distracting but as has been said nothing you could do about that. In spite of the background the birds stand out wonderfully, great color and detail. Thank you for sharing.
Joe Przybyla
"Sometimes I do get to places just as God is ready to have somebody click the shutter"... Ansel Adams
Beautiful flight shot! I always love it when I can get the pair together in one frame, and here you've gotten them with great upstroke and downstroke wing positions. And a quacking drake. Well captured. If mine, I would be tempted to brighten the image just slightly (except for the white neck patch), and try a very slight blur on the bg. But you may not like to do that sort of thing. Fine image just as it is.
Well done Kerry! Pintails are my nemesis ducks and I have yet to get a nice image of one.
Love the way the ducks are separated from the BG.I would be tempted to blur the BG ever so slightly to keep the colors but to lessen the impact.
Agree with Bill 100% ,
Gail
I just photographed my first ever male Pintail today...and at point-blank range no less! No flight opportunities though, and from your image I see that I missed seeing the beautiful speculum. I love the alternate wing positions, and I am OK with the BG, although I see why others are not as much. Striking image.
Thanks Mike! The Firefox histogram tool shows no pixels over 200 in the image, so I think it's because there's very little detail in that white area of the neck.
I'd rather trust PS's Color Sampler Tool for measuring tonal values. Zooming in and sampling four spots in the neck shows the brightest value I found as 253, 254, 251. Bright but definitely with some subtle detail. If you were concerned, there is probably information to be pulled out from that area in raw conversion.
Not sure why the FF plugin would show nothing over 200.
Diane, you are right! I wasn't seeing the little line along the bottom of the histogram. PS does show some hot pixels, so I could revisit this image in the raw file.
Mike, you were right too. I processed this image on my laptop in my trailer in Socorro, and missed those hot pixels. Thanks to both of you.
Last edited by Kerry Perkins; 11-29-2014 at 07:25 PM.
"It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera... they are made with the eye, heart, and head." - Henri Cartier Bresson