Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Looking for help on this one, is it possible to remove this branch?

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Katy, Texas
    Posts
    197
    Threads
    51
    Thank You Posts

    Default Looking for help on this one, is it possible to remove this branch?

    Name:  WhiteCrownedSparrow_w.jpg
Views: 334
Size:  296.3 KB


    I got this White-Crowned Sparrow when shooting from the back door of a blind. Unfortunately as you can see there is an out of focus branch in front of its feet. I was not able to move to a position where the branch was out of the way before the sparrow flew away, so this is what I have. I like the shot otherwise (other than cropping & resizing no other work has been done on it yet).

    Any thoughts on how to remove the branch and still have feet that look right? All my attempts so far have failed. If it isn't possible, what would you do with this one - crop into a head shot, 3/4 body shot, leave it as is, or throw it away? Any input will be appreciated.

    Barry

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It's a great shot of the bird -- sharp and detailed, good light. I'd start with the easy things -- remove the branches in the LL, the two sticking out of the head and back, the two horizontal ones in the UL and the very OOF one through the tail. Then I'd ask myself if that's enough. It wouldn't be impossible to remove the branch in front of the feet but it would require a lot of care to rebuild the feet. Even the perch branch could be tricky to get right, but not impossible. When you start cloning, you're a painter! You could make the job easier by removing everything left of the perch branch, but maybe things are looking a little stark then?

    When I'm cloning in light or dark areas I use a trick to be sure I'm getting smooth tonalities. Make a Curves or Levels layer above your layers stack and bring both ends in until there is huge, ugly contrast. Set it to Luminosity mode if saturation gets in your way. Then as you clone you can really see what you're getting.

    I'd live with it as is rather than throw it away.

  3. #3
    BPN Member Don Lacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    3,566
    Threads
    348
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Barry, The amount of cloning and work needed to remove the branch is well beyond my skill set, Wish i could help but I am not sure were you would get the pixels needed to build the feet of the sparrow
    Don Lacy
    You don't take a photograph, you make it - Ansel Adams
    There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams
    http://www.witnessnature.net/
    https://500px.com/lacy

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,315
    Threads
    3,979
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Most of that branch is easy enough to remove, but the part covering the feet is a tough one to get right without leaving some suspect evidence and yes it would take meticulous and long work. I don't have much patience with processing so that would help sway my decision to leaving it as is too. These guys can be easy to attract to a feeder setup so I would just give myself a reason to go back and get some other images of this species.

  5. Thanks Juan Carlos Vindas thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics