Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Red deer hind

  1. #1
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red deer hind

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hand held Canon 1DX Canon 500mm f4 Auto ISO 1000 1/250 sec f7.1. (No NR on the background)
    All C&C welcome.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jonathan - But did you apply any blur? The fall off in sharpness is immediate and the bg looks very smooth, making it almost look like the deer is in front of a screen. Nice fall colors and pose. I would prefer a little more room below.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hyderabad, India
    Posts
    5,088
    Threads
    1,356
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jon, nice image with good HA and details on the subject. I too wish for more room below. Nice soft light as well.

  4. #4
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback, no blur or anything was done to the background, it is just a limited DOF.

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jonathan, I like the pose and low POV gives a nice perspective, but do agree this does need more space below and personally I'm not a great fan of having the rear nearer the camera, but...

    Colour looks good and nice to have the head just below the tree line and not intersecting. I can see what Rachel is referring to regarding the BKG, but I would guess that the hind is standing above and that the ground behind, slopes down behind? You seem to like Auto ISO, something I never use, but if it works then cool.

    TFS
    Steve

  6. #6
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi Jonathan, I like the pose and low POV gives a nice perspective, but do agree this does need more space below and personally I'm not a great fan of having the rear nearer the camera, but...

    Colour looks good and nice to have the head just below the tree line and not intersecting. I can see what Rachel is referring to regarding the BKG, but I would guess that the hind is standing above and that the ground behind, slopes down behind? You seem to like Auto ISO, something I never use, but if it works then cool.

    TFS
    Steve
    Steve you are right regards the land. I use Auto ISO because I am so blown aay by the camera's capability compared to my 7D. The ISO setting doesn't really matter very much when it is somewhere between 100 and 1600 the quality is good throughout, I am more preoccupied with the shutter speed and or aperture. Using a custom function it is dead easy to set over or under exposure if required whilst still using Auto ISO.

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well, the difference should be there considering the cost, chalk & Cheese! The frame rate is great, but unless you REALLY need it, a lower frame rate and thinking about what you are shooting in terms of 'is it walking towards you or across you' and how you set the 'Case' will ensure a better rate of keepers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics