Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Squirrely

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default Squirrely

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    My house is built on a large granite dome and the abundant rocks have abundant cavities and crevasses for lots of Golden-mantled Ground squirrels (front animal) and chipmunks to make their homes. That stripe pattern must be a good one for both species to have it. Early morning entertainment is watching these critters scurry around, searching for dropped bird seeds and natural foods, while trying to avoid the hunting fox. When a fox is sighted those squirrels perch high on a protruding rock and sound the alarm, causing all the others to run. My dog has picked up on the alarm call and adds his own barking to the cause. I sit on the front porch with my camera and tripod at dawn until the sun gets too strong, or the coffee runs out !


    Canon 1DX, Canon 200-400 f4 L IS + 1.4x III @ 560mm, 1/1250, f8, ISO 800, exposure compensation +1/3.

    Comments and critiques most appreciated.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy - it's nice to see the two species and I can just picture the scene with you out there with your coffee and your dog at the feet of your tripod barking. Colors look great and you've brought out good detail too. I think I would prefer more dof to get both in focus and given that you were using a tripod, you probably could have sacrificed a bit of ss to stop down even more. I would consider a crop from the bottom to remove some or all of the black/shade area. Fortunately, you don't have to go far to experiment with your settings .

    TFS,
    Rachel

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    390
    Threads
    23
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    For once I will disagree with Rachel :) maybe against the forum rules :o But more DOF would have made the BG very harsh, the light was very strong from the looks of things and those nasty contrast highlights would be much worse at f10 or 11. So no, I like it as it is.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Andre Pretorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hluhluwe, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    Posts
    1,237
    Threads
    135
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy

    Love the setting and these two almost facing each other.
    Agree with Neil on DOF.
    In some images I took there was an old log/dried wood present, I found hot spots on log- was surprised to see that you employed +0.3EV?
    ETTR in my opinion really works at high ISO to keep the noise in darks to a minimum. Did you expose with Matrix metering? That would explain the settings..
    Is there any advantage in this over using centre weighted metering?

    Just trying to find my feet in the muddy water
    Regards

    Andre.

    www.gappimages.com

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you all for your thoughtful comments and critiques.

    I don't think increased DOF would have helped the back chipmunk. It is really farther away than this image suggests.

    Andre, I am thinking about your good question. I cannot remember the exact lighting conditions that made me add +1/3 exp. comp. For you are right that bright areas in an old gray log would be prone to overexposure. I do check my histogram frequently, both to expose to the right and not have blinkies. I used evaluative metering mode. It was 652 am and maybe I needed to add that extra exposure. I didn't have any hot spots on the log.

    Rachel, I like the suggestion of cropping some from the bottom.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer Steve Canuel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,444
    Threads
    444
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    With the tripod setup, combining two pictures focused on each animal in PP may be an option to try. Nice to note the difference in facial markings.

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy, to have a few blinks may not hurt as you will be surprised what you can recover, but in harsh light, blown whites are blown whites, but experiment and see as it's a good way to explore and learn IMHO.

    When I first saw the image I felt it's way too contrasty, the shadows are heavy and the detail in the eye is choked. If you revisit the RAW you will be able to retrieve some detail back in the shadows, the eye and the fur doesn't look so crunchy, I've tried it and it helps. Pulling back the Contrast also helps and at ISO 800 you should not get much noise in those areas I feel. I'm OK with the DoF and I like the way the grass flanks either side of the image. Perhaps a little off top & bottom?

    TFS
    Steve

  8. #8
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,906
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy i really like this as is , well almost ........ Nice to see two species in that combo in one frame.
    I am with Neil about the DOF , just leave it .
    I do agree with Steve about the overall contrast and the choked looking shadows , a bit lower would help the image i think.You might try to blend the dark dominating blob in the BKG into the green foliage.

    Andre , you still fight for your centre weighted .......... no need in these days ........... most of the times .

    TFS Andreas

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks everyone for such helpful suggestions. I'll go back and work with the image.

  10. #10
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nancy, the framing by the foliage is nice, and the repetition/mirrored poses works well for me.
    I too find the contrast a bit harsh and the light certainly wasn't in your favour. Have you tried experimenting with this in monochrome? Some nice texture and the framing could work well if you convert the greens of the foliage in a separate layer for better tonal separation from the subjects...
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics