Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Southern Royal Albatross sky-call

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    895
    Threads
    94
    Thank You Posts

    Default Southern Royal Albatross sky-call

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    The breeding season starts in October-November with the return to the colony of breeding males followed by females during the next two weeks. The males begin nest construction while waiting for their partners to arrive. Unfortunately, some females never arrive leaving their partners isolated in the colony. The males call for their partners until January when they finally lose hope and return to sea. The picture shows one such male that we found at the Campbell Is colony, still calling for his partner on 8 January 2014.
    Canon 5DIII + 300 mm f/2.8L II + 2x III extender, Gitzo 3532LS, Kirkphoto King Cobra gimbal.
    Av priority, f/10, 1/1000 sec, ISO 640.
    PP in DPP: crop, adjust WB, brightness, shad/h'lights, USM, RAW-tiff. PS Elements: brighten eye, tiff-output jpeg, USM.
    Critical feedback welcome. Thanks for looking.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,119
    Threads
    63
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful shot! Very nice expoosure! I would do a selective NR on the background.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    895
    Threads
    94
    Thank You Posts

    Default Southern Royal Albatross sky-call

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks for feedback - much appreciated. I see what you mean. I decided I needed to increase the brightness a little and it has also increased the noise. In this repost I have given the background a little noise reduction - hope it looks better.

  4. #4
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ian I would suggest you try a Linear burn, or a Luminosity adjustment to try and coax out more detail & depth from within the white plumage. Also your file does not have an embedded colour profile, check your setting for when you convert to sRGB for web images, I bet it's an unchecked box.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,119
    Threads
    63
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Wilson View Post
    Thanks for feedback - much appreciated. I see what you mean. I decided I needed to increase the brightness a little and it has also increased the noise. In this repost I have given the background a little noise reduction - hope it looks better.
    The background noise look better in the repost!

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Marina Scarr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    10,347
    Threads
    403
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Killer behavior captured here. What an awesome pose, and I just love the vegetation/habitat. RP looks better in terms of noise.
    Marina Scarr
    Florida Master Naturalist
    Website, Facebook

  7. #7
    BPN Member Don Lacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    3,566
    Threads
    348
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    HI Ian, I would run another round of NR on the bg and if you have Color Efexs 4 use the detail extractor on the bird only at about 24% opacity. Love the pose and environment
    Don Lacy
    You don't take a photograph, you make it - Ansel Adams
    There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams
    http://www.witnessnature.net/
    https://500px.com/lacy

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,362
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ian, you have captured a great calling pose, and we have a great view of the bill. I do like the surrounding folige, but could see a version as a vertical too. Your repost has sorted out the noise. Well done.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    895
    Threads
    94
    Thank You Posts

    Default Southern Royal Albatross sky-call

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thank you so much to all who gave me feedback on this image. You gave me confidence that the image was worth persevering with and I went back to the RAW file and started over again. In handling the whites I first looked closely to see if there was extra detail that could be extracted but found little to work with as this picture was taken late in the day in overcast conditions. Even though the image is almost full frame with width over 5000 pixels, there is very little contrast from fine feather detail that one might expect to see in direct sunlight. I decided to pull back the strongest whites from about 245 DN to 235 DN and be more aggressive with the shadow and highlight adjustment. This has resulted in more structural contrast on for example, the bird's neck. I have also been more aggressive with NR on the background. Regarding the suggestion of a portrait crop, this was my first inclination but it resulted in cutting off the nice clump of Poa in the background. I then decided to go with the landscape option and include all of the Poa. Thanks once again for all your help - much appreciated. Ian

  10. #10
    BPN Member Don Lacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    3,566
    Threads
    348
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Your repost pulls the most out of the image well done
    Don Lacy
    You don't take a photograph, you make it - Ansel Adams
    There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams
    http://www.witnessnature.net/
    https://500px.com/lacy

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,099
    Threads
    166
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Really like the latest background noise reduction, but to me a regular application of Noise Ninja brought slightly more snap to the eye and dark feathers.
    Beautiful image.

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    895
    Threads
    94
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian McHenry View Post
    Really like the latest background noise reduction, but to me a regular application of Noise Ninja brought slightly more snap to the eye and dark feathers.
    Beautiful image.
    Hi Ian, Thanks for your kind comments and tip regarding the use of Noise Ninja. I did not apply any noise reduction to the bird and since I received two infringement notices from the 'sharpening police' I have been very careful, perhaps too careful, with the amount of sharpening I use.
    Regards, Ian

  13. #13
    Lifetime Member Ákos Lumnitzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,561
    Threads
    71
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The biggest influence on getting noise in images is how you expose it in the first place. Shooting to the right as far as you can (on the histogram) then reducing exposure during post processing makes a HUGE difference, especially at high ISOs. So many people don't seem to grasp that concept. It's the simplest to learn and will get you the best possible quality image data and noise performance (lack of noise that is).

    Wonderful image by the way!

  14. #14
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    895
    Threads
    94
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you to everyone who gave feedback on this post - much appreciated.
    Regards, Ian

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics