Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Lesser Scaup with Shawl

  1. #1
    BPN Member Terry Johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Lake Oswego, Oregon
    Posts
    303
    Threads
    131
    Thank You Posts

    Default Lesser Scaup with Shawl

    Name:  Lesser-Scaup-1-for-web.jpg
Views: 96
Size:  344.0 KB

    This image was taken at the Rhodie Gardens in Portland, OR

    Nikon D800
    Nikon 70-200mm with 2.0 Teleconverter @ 400mm
    F5.6
    ISO-560
    1/750
    HH

    Your thoughts please...Terry Johnson

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Mike Poole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    3,251
    Threads
    314
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I'd say this is decent enough as a record shot, you've kept detail in both the whites and blacks which isn't always easy. However, as a photograph, I'd have liked to see more space for the scaup to swim into and getting even further down towards eye level would make a big difference to the end result

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lafayette, IN
    Posts
    157
    Threads
    27
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    You did a good job of keeping the whites from being blown. I like the water drops on the scaup. The angle of the photo looks a little steep to me. It would've been better if you were lower to the ground when taking the picture. If that were possible.

  4. #4
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,828
    Threads
    1,356
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Terry,
    I am not sure what to make of these photo's you post.
    Are you being serious?
    This location is so easy to get eye level pleasing photo's of many beautiful duck species, i have no idea why you don't try?
    You ask for thoughts and everyone suggests you get lower for these shots and give the ducks a bit of space.
    You either just ignore the critiques or you like these, which is fine, however I wonder why you bother to post them
    when you know what the critiques will be….
    Looking down on these birds is showing no appreciation for them IMO, when it is so simple at this garden to
    get eye level photos of them.
    Just my 2 cents…..
    Dan Kearl

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Hamilton, NJ
    Posts
    288
    Threads
    22
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It look good Terry. I would try reducing shadows or black level a tad for the head and neck. If you have room, I would open it up which may also help sharpen the image.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Terry,
    I like the "shawl" and the iridescence on the head.
    This image would be a lot stronger if you could get lower. I live on my belly when shooting from the shoreline. This does 2 things. One, it minimizes your profile so the bird will likely come closer if you are patient and 2. it usually gives you a better BG and a much more intimate picture.
    Try it, you'll like it!!
    (Of course, if you have a physical impairment that prevents you from getting low I take it all back.)
    Gail

  7. #7
    BPN Member Terry Johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Lake Oswego, Oregon
    Posts
    303
    Threads
    131
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mike, Rod, Rob, and Gail, thanks for your comments, they are appreciated.

    Dan, I have sent you an e-mail off line about your criticism...Terry Johnson

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics