Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Mountain Goat

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default Mountain Goat

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Photographed last summer at Mt. Evans, west of Denver and famous for very accessible Mt. Goats. I make a trip to this fabulous place every year for the goats and marmots. It can be bitter cold with howling winds but always worth it.

    Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS @ 125 mm, 1/1000, f8, ISO 800, +1 exposure compensation.

    Comments & critiques most appreciated.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,797
    Threads
    708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nice portrait here Nancy showing good detail and exposure work,
    I'm seeing a slight halo (on my cal retina monitor) around the image more evident around the horns & ears, an easy fix of course.


  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Marc, I now see the halo. What is the easy fix? Any ideas what caused the halo?

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy - I also see the halo. Did you use shadows and highlights at all? Sometimes that can cause a halo. Sometimes it can be selective adjustments to tone or exp. Probably a host of other things too. It doesn't look like a sharpening halo.

    I think you can still bring out more detail by taming the highlights on the body a bit. The bg has a slight greyish/blue tint, I would actually try going high key with it. The image does make it feel like it was cold blustery day.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  5. #5
    Story Sequences Moderator and Wildlife Moderator Gabriela Plesea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    7,738
    Threads
    455
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Halo Nancy,

    I did not see the halo until Marc and Rachel pointed it out... I just love the POV here, great detail, nice framing of the subject and I agree with Rachel above on going high key with the BG, I would love to see an RP with that "frosty" look, if possible

    Warmest regards,
    Gabriela Plesea

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    390
    Threads
    23
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Agreed you could pull up the exposure more to brighten the BG, avoid the halo which looks like a shadow type masking halo. But bags of detail and maybe I would be tempted to spend a little time on a mono version, there is plenty of scope and texture to give it a nice gritty feel.

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy, this illustrates my point about IQ from the previous body/lens, this now looks really good. I'm glad you have some tone in the BKG otherwise it might be to hi key/stark, well for my tastes. A slight head turn would be good as I get the impression the subject is slightly angled away from you and certainly not parallel. I like the minimal colour palette too. Techs look good.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,797
    Threads
    708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nancy Bell View Post
    Marc, I now see the halo. What is the easy fix? Any ideas what caused the halo?
    I think Rachel has answered the question on the causes & effects of halo's.
    For me, I find that using the feather tool in layer mask when making adjustments eliminates most of the halo issues, others may have different solutions.


  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you all for the good suggestions and comments. I'll give this some tweaking.

    Steve, I have always loved the sharpness of my 70-200 lens and it seems to be a good fit with the Canon 5D Mark III. Would love to have a larger lens with equal sharpness .

  10. #10
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steve, I have always loved the sharpness of my 70-200 lens and it seems to be a good fit with the Canon 5D Mark III. Would love to have a larger lens with equal sharpness.
    Nancy, the 70-200 is a great lens and perfect for a lot of photographic work, Avian, Wildlife & Landscapes, however having a longer lens may give you the reach, the weight maybe a drawback, especially when scaling these locations.

    At present I have a wager with someone over mainly using the 70-200 & 200-400 later this year and that the 500 will be redundant, I will let you know the outcome.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  11. #11
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nancy - I'm enjoying having the 70-200 II and the 300 II. The 300 II is light enough that I can handhold it all day or use it with a monopod if I want. It takes the tcs really well too and is a lot lighter than the other superteles.

    Rachel

  12. #12
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,797
    Threads
    708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    At present I have a wager with someone over mainly using the 70-200 & 200-400 later this year and that the 500 will be redundant, I will let you know the outcome.
    Might have some of that money as well, I had the Nikon 200-400 and sold it for the 500VR quite a few years ago now and have never regretted it, getting over the loss of zoom versality was soon placated by the new
    and fab 80-400AF-S . (Canon needs to replace their aging 100-400 dust sucker soon.)


  13. #13
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cool high key portrait here Nancy...
    Besides the halo I think I see some CA fringing around the horns?
    Some good suggestions already given which I won't rehash.
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics