-
Lifetime Member
-
Rachel, lovely portrait of a species we don't see often up close. It is not too tight for me. Excellent detail and sharpness on the tusks and whiskers/nose. I know you were shooting from a moving boat and with the 7D you chose to keep ISO-800 and settle for F5.6, but I think this image would benefit from a little more DOF. TFS. Loi
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Amazing tusks & whiskers! The battle scars show he's been though some rough times! I like the central placement and tight framing.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Wildlife Moderator
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
BPN Member
Hi Rachel,
lovely head on shot of the Walrus. Good detail, soft colors and lovely sharpness where it counts.I think DOF could be a bit more to get more of the head sharp, easy to say with hindsight , sitting in front of images from others….. LOL.
I do not mind the tightness of the frame, but then Steve has the right answer, go really tight, good Job Steve of pointing this option out.
TFS Andreas
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
It's hard for me to decide between the 2 crops. Both are good. However for me it is all about the near symmetry of the face, with the 2 tusks and the bright, sharp details of the whiskers, moving to the nose and back to the sleepy-looking eyes! The evenly spread out battle scars, somewhat soft in focus, are an interesting backdrop for the face.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
BPN Member
Hi Rachel,
very nice close up of this walrus. I might would go as well for a closer crop, like Steve did. Oh right, yes for me also to tight, but you know that already 
Have a great eve
Ciao
Anette
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Lifetime Member
Thanks everyone, much appreciated. Steve - I like the tighter crop too.
Thanks again,
Rachel
-
Great to see another close up from you Rachel of this big fella.
I like the repost as I found my eyes hunting as they were drawn into the image and down the tusks where the dof dropped off.
Jamie
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
BPN Member
That's a hunk of blubber! Cool portrait, Rachel. I agree that it's a tad tight on top but no deal-breaker for me. I actually prefer your OP crop as it shows how fat this dude was
(perhaps just crop a little squarer on that one, from the sides?)
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Lifetime Member
Thanks Jamie and Morkel. I'll play around with the crop a bit for alternatives.
Thanks again,
Rachel