Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Last of the Sun

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    Posts
    719
    Threads
    159
    Thank You Posts

    Default Last of the Sun



    The last of the suns rays peek out from behind a distant rock face over the wilderness of Valley of Fire State Park. It was a good trek in the desert to get there but it was well worth it. Its winter so the sun casts a very different and much softer light than had this been taken in the summer.

    Sony A100, Raw, Sony 16-50/2.8, 16mm, F/9, 1/125s, ISO 100

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wonderful! Great tonalities, especially as brought out in the shady areas of the rock, great light, great sunburst! There is some posterization in the sky -- did that happen when you made the JPEG? Working in 16 bits in PS should allow a smooth gradient.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    Posts
    719
    Threads
    159
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Is this any better?


    Its something to do with the way photoshop is saving it, there is nothing wrong with the sky in the regular image, not sure why its doing that.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Looks the same to me. Then I pulled it into PS and see it's a PNG file. Very limited tonal range in them -- intended for web page graphics. Save as a JPEG and you'll probably be fine.
    Last edited by Diane Miller; 02-15-2014 at 04:45 PM.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    Posts
    719
    Threads
    159
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very very lightly, its there so its not just your monitor, for me its extremely light, not sure why its doing it.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I found out what it is and was editing my post as you posted -- see just above.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    Posts
    719
    Threads
    159
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ok Jpeg at 100% quality.


    I personally find PNG24 to be quite good for images, I always find Jpegs compress my sharpening too much. Does it look better to you?
    Last edited by Dvir Barkay; 02-15-2014 at 05:02 PM.

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I'm out of my depth on the differences -- I always thought the conventional wisdom was that PNG (I don't know a 24 from anything else) had limited colors. Maybe something has changed over the years that I missed.

    I'd just ask this, out of curiosity -- If you did the conversion as a JPEG is the posterization still there?

    Other here can answer better, I'm sure, and I don't mean to get your thread off track.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    When I open it in PS it also says the PNG format doesn't support embedded profiles. That can cause a lot of variation (none of it good) in how people see images in a browser.

    See a sticky at the top of the ETL forum.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    Posts
    719
    Threads
    159
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I did the conversion in jpeg its right above your post thats why I asked if you think it looks better?

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sorry, I missed that -- thought I had dragged the second one but apparently got the first one. NOW I see you wrote that in the post.

    They're the same for posterization -- would be interesting to see where it came from but still a very lovely image!!

    And the pitfalls of no profile is something to be aware of.

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    Posts
    719
    Threads
    159
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, yeah I am not sure why this is happening. Funny thing is that it has happened to me before with images with clouds that had no posterization when in regular TIFF or Raw format. Yet when I down sampled and saved, all of a sudden there was annoying posterization. I am certainly no expert on this so hopefully someone that knows how to correct this can help. Thanks Diane for all the help!

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The posterization would have to come from going to an 8 bit image. It would only show (be perceptible) in certain gradients where there aren't many tonal levels.

  14. #14
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,833
    Threads
    1,358
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the scene and the sunburst, (they seem to be the "in" device in Landscape photography this year).
    One easy fix to posterization for web presentation in plain blue skies like this is to use some Gaussion blur to smooth it out.
    Dan Kearl

  15. #15
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dvir Barkay View Post
    Thanks, yeah I am not sure why this is happening. Funny thing is that it has happened to me before with images with clouds that had no posterization when in regular TIFF or Raw format. Yet when I down sampled and saved, all of a sudden there was annoying posterization. I am certainly no expert on this so hopefully someone that knows how to correct this can help. Thanks Diane for all the help!
    Here's some useful information on posterization -- I started to try to write it out then found this:

    http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tut...terization.htm

  16. #16
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    Posts
    719
    Threads
    159
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yeah thanks for that. I know why it happens already kind of, its just I am frustrated why it appears so much compared to what I see in my Tiff files, which have none of it.

  17. #17
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice composition and scene Dvir. Good use of the sunburst as well.
    I might have liked to see the rock face on the RHS (directly to the right of the sunburst) to be a tad darker (and I do mean very sligthly).
    Posterization is always more pronounced in clear-blue-sky images, why I'm not qualified to say. I've also never saved as PNG so don't ask me about that either (apparently they say PNG is best for Facebook posting as well due to lesser compression used).
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics