Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Goosander

  1. #1
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,778
    Threads
    1,094
    Thank You Posts

    Default Goosander

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon 7D
    Canon F/2.8 300mm, 1x4TC
    F4, 1/400
    ISO 1000

    Image captured in Fife, Scotland

    Cropped and sharpened in CS6

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Minneola, Florida
    Posts
    170
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice capture. I think some fill flash would have brought out the details on the head and lighten up the subject.

  3. Thanks William Dickson thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi William, I love the colour of the water and the pattern within it. I also like the water bubbles coming from the bow wave too. I know it would be a big step, but just darkening the exposure or using a Graduate filter to balance the top RHS would help. Maybe even adding say +12 on the saturation to give a bit more richness to the overall image. IMHO you needed more DoF, adding more sharpening centrally helps to the main body of the plumage, but I wonder if the FP was there rather than the head, as it looks a little soft. Perhaps just upping the exposure on the head just a wee bit would help but not much. Dropping the blue gives a bit more to the mid grey body plumage, WDYT?

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  5. #4
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,778
    Threads
    1,094
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the advice Steve, yes your correct the focal point was the body, The bird was actually moving quite fast at the time, as you can see from the water movement. I was using AV mode, and I think, I was actually lucky to get so much in focus, as this mode set the SS to 1/400, which is way too slow. I actually took a few captures of this bird, and the water reflections were different on each pic, caused by the reflection of over hanging trees etc.

    I will keep trying different settings, and keep practising on the post production

    Thanks for the advice Steve, much appreciated

  6. #5
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,778
    Threads
    1,094
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Name:  goosander.jpg
Views: 63
Size:  398.7 KB

    This is the same bird, same settings, but with a shutter speed of 1/1000, and a different coloured background because the bird had moved.

    Which image, between the two of them would you say was the better

  7. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    48
    Threads
    6
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi William, i prefer the second image with improved sharpness especially at the head area.
    It also has better POV as it was captured from lower angle which make it more appealing.

  8. Thanks William Dickson thanked for this post
  9. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Definitely the second posting William.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  10. Thanks William Dickson thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics