Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Sparring bears

  1. #1
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default Sparring bears

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Just to keep Anette & Rachel company.

    Looking back it's easy to see how IQ and overall techs have changed since this was taken. Like both Anette & Rachel have experienced, this was taken from a moving zodiac. There were three bears we followed for around half an hour, once they surfaced they would roll around in the snow to both, dry themselves and to clean their fur. I've gone tighter in. as the third bear was in the process of rolling in the snow and the head is just in the top LH corner. A bit of an experiment as I wanted to get some motion if possible in the sparring paws, this a few more frames were probably the best, but hey, nothing like experimenting. I could have gone higher on ISO, smaller DoF to gain more SS, but then everything would have been frozen (no pun intended). Probably a different approach now with the advent of new kit and more advanced PP.

    Thanks for the previous comments.

    Cheers
    Steve

    Subject: Sparring polar bears (Ursus maritimus)
    Location: Svalbard
    Camera: Canon MKIII
    Lens: 300f/2.8 HH
    Exposure: 1/160s at f/7.1 ISO400 +0.67 EV Comp
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, California, United States
    Posts
    3,023
    Threads
    416
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Steve, thanks for explaining your thought process in capturing this image. You had good DOF, your exposure is perfect, and the low SS gave done blur to the paw. I think that the approach s good, but perhaps you need a different, more dynamic pose to convey the motion. Must have been a thrilled to see these interactions. TFS. Loi

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Steve - excellent detail as always. I like the sense of movement from the blurred leg and it's always nice to see interaction. Interesting to see the variation in color of the bears. These are much more brown/red than the ones I saw.

    TFS.
    Rachel

  4. #4
    BPN Member Anette Mossbacher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,818
    Threads
    95
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Steve,

    also like the blur of the leg very much. The color looks good of them. They are wet and probably more yellowish when dry. Full fed on good stuff than and not seaweed
    We did not witness any bears interacting with each other. They all had their distance from each other, at least 100m. I guess they have been so dirty, maybe they smelled a bit!!

    Details are great as usual and I do not mind either that they look in the "wrong" direction

    Have a great eve

    Ciao

    Anette

    PS looking for the funny writing!! Don't see it so I hit post quickly :))

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks folks, as I said, it was just trying this time to think of another avenue. I think Rachel they will just vary in colour, perhaps I needed to place a mid grey card in the snow for colour balance?

    Hopefully Anette the 'funny writing' has stopped based on the steps suggested?
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  6. Thanks Anette Mossbacher thanked for this post
  7. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    390
    Threads
    23
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Looks good Steve, POV looked a little odd at first but the zodiak explained it... ;) blurred swipe is a nice touch.

  8. #7
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Lovely interaction here Steve! I appreciate the bears all have different colours/nuances. I think the bears themselves can stand a bit of lightening in the shadows/midtones?
    I dig the tracks in the snow.
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  9. #8
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,917
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Steve,
    great interaction between the two bears, sadly wrong direction….., nothing you could do.
    Good sharpness and detail for the techs given.Great detail in the snow.
    I am with Morkel about the mid tones ,would lighten them in the fur to get even more detail in there.
    If i get you right, this is an old PP process, if so make it new with your skills of today.Would like to see the difference.
    The blacks look a bit flat, for my eyes.

    TFS Andreas

  10. #9
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks folks, that afternoon was a very grey and flat day, no great tonal range, therefore the image was a tad under exposed, again both Anette & Rachel will know when I say a grey day I have added some subtle mid tone and some Curve adjustments, not harsh but enough I feel, more noticeable in the depressions in the snow and the shadow areas of the bears. I don't want it being too 'contrasty' meaning a huge difference between the blacks & whites, this is as far as I would take it.

    Old camera Andreas, but converted via the up-to-date LR/PS, as the features in there are really good and in some parts very helpful, as you can 'sculpt' the light more.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  11. #10
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,917
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steve - i know old camera , but i asked about the PP not the camera, so no excuse….LOL.
    RP looking a bit better to me .Understanding your point about shooting conditions,but i still like to see more contrast, it is just me.

    Andreas

  12. #11
    BPN Viewer Steve Canuel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,444
    Threads
    444
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Not seeing much of a difference in the two posts, both are nicely detailed and lit as to the conditions you described. I like the interaction between the two, the slightly sloped appearance of the ground, and how the comp has one almost vertical, the other almost horizontal.

  13. #12
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like both images in truth I see little difference, quality looks just fine to me, I like the small movement in the paw, ideally we would be able to see a bit more of the right bear's face but it wasn't to be.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics