Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Double Crested Cormorant portrait - full breeding plumage

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cardiff, CA
    Posts
    152
    Threads
    26
    Thank You Posts

    Default Double Crested Cormorant portrait - full breeding plumage

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I took this shot of the DCC in full breeding plumage this past weekend in La Jolla, California. There were 3 other photographers present and all shutters were firing at full speed when it stretched its pouch for over a minute, showing the robin's egg blue of the inside of its mouth that only occurs during breeding season.

    1D Mark IV, 300mm f/2.8, 1/4000 f/5.6, ISO 800, hand held

    I'd love to hear your comments and suggestions.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member David Salem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    6,664
    Threads
    276
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    What a great pose and a terrific look at this guy. Love the array colors in this and the blue BG sets it off perfectly. Very cool Bob. The only issue is its a bit soft and has allot of noise in it. Resharpen and add NR to the BG and you will have a real winner!

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cardiff, CA
    Posts
    152
    Threads
    26
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Dave - Thanks for the comments! I'm not sure what happened here. The native pic looks sharp and in focus on my screen. But when I uploaded it, it seems to have blown it up much larger and made it fuzzy. If a moderator has a suggestion for correcting my technical ineptitude, I'd appreciate it!

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Bob, your image as presented is within the spec 1109 x 900. The system should only display what you have asked it to upload, so cant explain your dilemma. What is the size of your saved image that you would like to post?

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cardiff, CA
    Posts
    152
    Threads
    26
    Thank You Posts

    Default Repost at smaller size

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Here's the image before I saved it with BPN sizing. I'm sure the IQ was diminished from tight cropping, but the clarity of this smaller size is much better.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Bret Goddard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Northern Virginia USA
    Posts
    155
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent, congrats too.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great detail shot and color, but it looks like the IQ has taken a hit from a large crop. If there are not other distracting elements in the frame, allowing more room might be something to consider.

  8. Thanks Bob Serling thanked for this post
  9. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    UK / RSA
    Posts
    407
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    After the first couple of posts about IQ and noise I waited for your re-post before commenting Bob.
    The image is very striking and grabs the attention but even at the smaller size there are still issues with softness and noise.

  10. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cardiff, CA
    Posts
    152
    Threads
    26
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks everyone for your comments and suggestions. I agree that it's still a bit soft. Guess I'll go in and try to add some sharpening as the only sharpening I used was the output sharpening from LR.

  11. #10
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Guess I'll go in and try to add some sharpening as the only sharpening I used was the output sharpening from LR.
    Bob, you always need to add/apply sharpening at the FINAL output size, irrespective of what you may or may not have applied earlier to the RAW/TIFF, however the amount will be far less.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  12. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It isn't clear to me whether the output sharpening from LR is added before or after the resizing step. There are 3 choices for Amount. If I use the Medium setting then I can improve the sharpness by doing a very careful Smart Sharpen (at 0.1 radius) on the JPEG. But if I use the High setting it looks basically like the one I sharpened after exporting, and I saved the step of re-saving a JPEG, which can't be good for quality.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics