Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Pro-size Camera Attached to Long Lens in Bag?

  1. #1
    BPN Member Jim Keener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Idyllwild, California
    Posts
    499
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default Pro-size Camera Attached to Long Lens in Bag?

    It would make things a lot easier to fit additional lenses into the bag if I left a 1DX attached to a 500mm lens. But. It seems to me that would increase the likelihood of damage to the camera and/or lens where the lens attaches if I did that?

    Is there experience here that answers that question?

    Thanks, Jim.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,647
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It's designed to withstand those stresses, which I don't think will be too high in a properly designed and arranged bag. Generally you're able to move the padding around in the bag and brace things that need to be braced. In the bag there should be much less stress than when you carry the camera and lens around shooting, holding it by the foot, mounted on a tripod, mounted on a monopod or hanging from the lens strap. Try not to hold the whole rig by the camera only.

  3. #3
    BPN Member Jim Keener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Idyllwild, California
    Posts
    499
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Dave,

    Thanks for your response. Visited your Flickr site. I especially liked the closeup of the red tailed hawk.

    Your comments make sense. I also like the idea of not having to open the camera and rear of the lens in what might be adverse conditions.

    Walk well.

  4. Thanks David Stephens thanked for this post
  5. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Katy, Texas
    Posts
    197
    Threads
    51
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I posed the same question to Arthur Morris in an email, but also focusing on traveling with them attached. Arthur highly recommended not attaching the body to the super telephoto lens in that circumstance due to the mount damage risk. Just wanting to pass this on.

  6. #5
    BPN Member Jim Keener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Idyllwild, California
    Posts
    499
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you, Barry. That's what intuition told me. Big lens and big camera are very different from what I'm used to. So much to learn. But I think I'm in the right place.

  7. #6
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I never travel with my big glass attached to a camera body. I've seen people with lenses that they can't remove from their bodies because of bent mounts. It costs hundreds of dollars to fix.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  8. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    131
    Threads
    53
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Brown View Post
    I never travel with my big glass attached to a camera body. I've seen people with lenses that they can't remove from their bodies because of bent mounts. It costs hundreds of dollars to fix.

    with travel you mean by air and long drives ,?? I leave my body attached to my lens when i am walking in a nature reserve or a short drive with a bicycle (off course in a backpack then )

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics