Canadian Goose, Nikon D800 with 70-200 F2.8 Lens with 2X teleconverter, ISO-280, F5.6, focal length 400MM, A-priority. Taken yesterday on the Columbia River near Portland, Oregon. A test of my new 2X teleconverter. Worked well on the goose, however, I am having problems with precise focus on a hummingbird at 15 feet with the 2X teleconverter. The 1.4 does fine. I am assuming it is the small bird and the round body that is causing the focuser to average.
Hi Terry, looks pretty sharp wide open. I assume this is FF and if that is so, I think the bird is a little big in the frame and too center. If it was a crop, a little more room on the LHS would work for me. Loi
Loi, thanks for the kind comments. In response to your preferring for me to provide more room on the left Hand side of the image, I could do this as the image was a crop. However, I am finding that many of the better photographers prefer to leave room on the side of the image the subject is facing similar to what you are suggesting. Is this a recommended standard? I am trying to find out why this seems to be the case.
Yes, that is recommended standard most of the time. It gives the appearance of room to look into or move into for the subject. It helps give a better and less "crammed" look for tighter comps and gives a nice balanced comp with a "rule of thirds" for looser comps. All these are guidelines only but are there for a good reason. Some images work well when these guidelines are broken, but the trick is to know when to do so.
You exposed your subject well, and I like the blues in the water. Good head angle too.
P.S. As a BPN "Member" (thank you for the support!) you can now upload your images to the BPN server which will generate a small thumbnail for your new image threads.
Terry, the image in your repost is far more appealing IMO! Not as good a head angle (but not bad) but the water looks much, much better. As does the comp with the extra room in front. I would crop that one up a bit from below to just above the small detached black reflection.