Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Mormon Row Landscape

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale
    Posts
    172
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default Mormon Row Landscape

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Grand Teton National Park - Wyoming.
    Taken with a Canon 5DIII and a 16-35mm 2.8L II at 35mm
    HDR compostion at 5 different exposures
    ISO 100
    spot metering
    auto white balance
    f/7.1
    No flash


    HDR created with Photomatix and edited in Lightroom 5 and Photoshop CS6

    Looking forward to your feedback and comments. Happy new year everyone!

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,546
    Threads
    171
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Andresleon?

    I should start by saying I am not a fan of HDR but I am willing to comment so...

    I like the subject, especially the barn, the mountains and the tree. The clouds also add mood. On the downside I think there is too much foreground and I would trim off the bottom so the mown grass 'path' intersects the lower LH corner.. This allows the eye to move into the image a little easier IMHO. I would also reduce some of the cloud so take some off the top also to make it more of a Pano format. There is also a little too much noise in the image but I am not sure if that due to the HDR processing so don't have a suggestion to fix that. Finally the mountain could do with a little more contrast I feel. The light is nice and I bet the scene was stunning at the time..

    regards

    DON

  3. Thanks andresleon thanked for this post
  4. #3
    BPN Member Bill Jobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,275
    Threads
    91
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Overall, I like the photo and your treatment, Andre.

    But I'm not sure about the yellow/brown sky at upper right.

    It doesn't look quite natural, and I find myself wondering what caused it, other than the sun behind the clouds.

    The impression of the photo would have been even more positive, to me, if the sky was consistently seen in its blue/slate color.
    Last edited by Bill Jobes; 01-03-2014 at 09:40 AM. Reason: typo
    Bill Jobes



    www.billjobes.com

    My BPN Gallery

    Walk Softly and Carry a Big Lens

  5. Thanks andresleon thanked for this post
  6. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale
    Posts
    172
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you, Don and Bill, for your comments and suggestions. They are much appreciated!

    Don, I also don't like the overly processed HDR images. I am trying hard to create natural-looking images that can still display a high dynamic range, so this is still a work in progress. I also think trimming the bottom right up to the path can help the image's composition. Again, thank you!

    Bill, I honestly don't know where the brown on the clouds came from. The sun was, indeed, rising behind me but I don't think that's why this color appeared. These same colors appear in each of my individual exposures so I don't think it is because of the HDR processing.

  7. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,647
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    IME, the colors of the clouds reflect the colors of the earth beneath them, reflecting up. Since there's lots of brown in the mid area before the mountains, that coloring actually seems plausible to me. The blueness in the rest of the clouds concerns me more, since I'm expecting grey there. I'm curious, did you simply combine your images and apply global color correction, or did you layer and adjust colors of the clouds, building, etc. separately? Perhaps there's a large lake nearby, lending blue to the clouds. Is that the case?

    I second the suggestion for more contrast on the mountains.

    The rainbow is actually there, isn't it? Sorry to ask, but you said nothing about it and its a huge element in this image.

    BTW, despite questions about colors, etc., I think this image would sell well in the right gallery. It'll pop off the wall. Hopefully you have the file resolution you need to blow it up BIG.

  8. Thanks andresleon thanked for this post
  9. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale
    Posts
    172
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi David,
    I used photomatix to create the initial HDR image combination of 5 different exposures. I then tweaked its settings to make it as realistic and natural as possible, though I know it still looks a little over done. I also removed some noise with Lightroom.

    The closest body of water is the snake river which is about a mile behind the house. It's a pretty big river, but don't think is the reason the sky looks so blue. When I was there the sky did have different hues of grey and blue as well a little of the brown, but this image really made them pop, which is a reason why I liked it! The exact location where this picture was taken is at this google maps link.

    The rainbow was, indeed, there! I got so excited when it came out that morning I couldn't believe it! There were a few other photographers near me that morning and they were all in shock at the view. We got really lucky! I just wish I had been able to capture it more beautifully! I have a couple of other pictures of the same barn with the rainbow such as this one (http://andres-leon.artistwebsites.co...dres-leon.html)

    Thank you!

  10. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I wonder if there was a huge tonal range in the middle exposure here? It would be interesting to compare what the Shadows and Highlights sliders in LR 5 can do on that one exposure, compared to the HDR. Since that processing improvement, which came out in LR4, I have often been unhappy with HDR compared to what I can do with the middle exposure. In some instances, one exposure for a darker FG and a different one for a brighter sky can be separately processed and then combined as masked layers. If you look at the image at 100%, using HDR, even realistically, there are so many small issues with subject and camera movement that you don't have in a single exposure.

  11. Thanks andresleon thanked for this post
  12. #8
    BPN Member Anette Mossbacher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,818
    Threads
    95
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Andre,

    Happy New Year

    as well not much HDR fan, but nevertheless I do like to comment on this one. The FG has for me a bit yellow cast, but maybe that is you like. Up to your taste. The scene I like very much as well the clouds and color.

    Have a great eve

    Ciao
    Anette

  13. Thanks andresleon thanked for this post
  14. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,647
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Andres, nice series on your web site.

    I'd always include "rainbow" in the title of any version of this if I were you. You indeed had your photographer's luck with you at this moment and took full advantage of it. Preparation met opportunity.

    Now that I live in Colorado, I see colors in nature that I never saw growing up in Florida and living in Oklahoma and Texas for years. A couple of weeks back I took a pre-sunrise that had the most incredible oranges and blues in it. On the radio they were calling it a "Broncos Sunrise" because it looked like the football teams colors. My photog friends and I saw and captured the same thing and every one of us said something in our description like "these colors are real, believe me." So, I'm not surprised about the colors in your wonderful shot. I believe what you're showing us is what you saw.

  15. Thanks andresleon thanked for this post
  16. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale
    Posts
    172
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I wonder if there was a huge tonal range in the middle exposure here?
    Diane, I believe the 5 shots that make up this image were about 1 stop apart. I am going to play with the original raws with PS layers to see what results I get. Thank you!

    Hi Anette, I, too, agree that there is a lot of yellow, but this color was due to the sunrise light coming from behind me. I actually think I had to tone the yellow hue a bit.

    David. You're absolutely right. The colors I saw in Grand Teton were truly incredible. I appreciate your feedback regarding the title as well.

  17. #11
    Landscapes Moderator Andrew McLachlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Thornton, Ontario
    Posts
    6,039
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great suggestions already for this one...I do agree on the noise, especially in the sky. I am fine with the comp as is...it works for my tastes. I think Diane is right that there is probably a middle exposure you could process to get a pleasing end result. I have also had mixed feelings about HDR and use it seldom, but when I do I tend to opt for Oloneo Photo Engine as it seems to give me the cleanest results. Nice work overall.

  18. #12
    BPN Member Don Lacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    3,566
    Threads
    348
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Andres, I really like the composition of this image and the placement of the elements within the frame, but I hate the HDR treatment here the image to my eye screams fake its all of one tonality without any shadows to create depth the image is flat and one dimensional. Since the sun is behind you I am not sure why you needed to go the HDR route like Diane I believe you could find a single frame that has enough information to produce a more realistic image that would really shine with color and depth.
    Don Lacy
    You don't take a photograph, you make it - Ansel Adams
    There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams
    http://www.witnessnature.net/
    https://500px.com/lacy

  19. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale
    Posts
    172
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Andrew and Don, thank you both for your comments and suggestions. I do have a few mid-tone exposures that I can play around with to see what I get. I've been experimenting with creating HDR that look realistic and genuine. I obviously still have a long way to go! :) What I have discovered, at least about myself, is that the more I work on an image, the less realistic and natural it gets, but I fail to notice that. So I now know that I have to step back from my work, to ensure I am not over-processing. Is this just me? or does that happen to others when working on their images?

    Again, thank you all for your feedback!

  20. #14
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,546
    Threads
    171
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andresleon View Post
    Andrew and Don, thank you both for your comments and suggestions. I do have a few mid-tone exposures that I can play around with to see what I get. I've been experimenting with creating HDR that look realistic and genuine. I obviously still have a long way to go! :) What I have discovered, at least about myself, is that the more I work on an image, the less realistic and natural it gets, but I fail to notice that. So I now know that I have to step back from my work, to ensure I am not over-processing. Is this just me? or does that happen to others when working on their images?

    Again, thank you all for your feedback!

    Hi Andrew, I too often don't see 'things' in my processing my own work that are obvious in other peoples work. I have often thought 'why do I do this' and the only explanation I can suggest is that you (the photographer) have the vision in your mind of the scene you took and maybe this dominates over the image you actually took of that scene when you are processing...? I don't really know... The Good news is that in time you get better at looking at the image as opposed to looking at the vision you have in your mind, also I have found walking away for 20 minutes and then returning to evaluate what you have done can help. Sometime after doing this I have to start again...and again....etc.

    regards

    DON

  21. Thanks andresleon thanked for this post
  22. #15
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I definitely find I need to compare a "work in progress" to other things I've done, or other people's work, to get some perspective. I'll usually let something sit for a few days. A classic example is using some of the Nik filters to punch things up -- clicking back to the original BG layer it always looks so much flatter than I had thought it was. I usually wind up halfway in between, though. With HDR, I'll usually process a series several ways (Photomatix and Nik, for instance) and then do what I can with the original best exposure. Since the new ACR/LR Process 2012 sliders came out, I've wound up throwing the HDRs away in favor of the single frame. I do need to learn to use PS's HDR, though -- I've never mastered it -- and to check out HDR Expose 3, of which Tim Grey recently gave a favorable review.

    A critique forum such as this one is a great place to find out how other people see something.

  23. Thanks andresleon thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics