Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Floating feather

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default Floating feather

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I was out yesterday frustrating myself trying to shoot ducks with the 600mm + 2x on my 5D3. The AF just isn't up to the task -- it searches fairly quickly but too long (and far) before making up its mind to lock on. I had slightly better luck with still life, although this was drifting enough in a very gentle breeze to still be a challenge.

    ISO 1600, 1/4000 sec, f/9.5. I should have brought down the ISO and gone for a little more DOF but I was just grabbing an opportunity while waiting for a diving bird to re-surface. Cropped to 35% of the original frame.

    Minimal adjustments in LR5, touched out 2 spots in the water, and a trip to CS6 for NR and a touch of sharpening -- hardly enough to show here.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is a very clever image Diane. Congratulations. Love it as presented. Could up the vibrance a little for some extra punch, but as I said, love it.

    For me an image like this it what nature photography is all about.

  3. #3
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dianne:

    This one works well for me. Still water, well exposed, nice reflection.

    I might try a version with the rachis of the OOF area toned down a bit (lower the luminosity) so it doesn't pull our eye away from the in focus area quite so quickly.

    Cheers

    Randy
    MY BPN ALBUMS

    "Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, guys. I'll try that Randy -- good idea. I was a little surprised that the reflection didn't come out darker here. John, I thought about tweaking Vibrance a little (I'm not shy), but the softer tones as the RAW converter interpreted them seemed to fit the quietness of the image.

    You'll never hear me say "That's the way it was." It's the way the RAW converter thinks it was (or should have been). And if I tweak something, it's the way I THINK it was -- or the way I wish it had been.

    I love being able to do that, though!

  5. #5
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Diane:

    I posted a somewhat similar image years ago, and did do a little tweaking of the luminosity to highlight certain areas. I felt it did strengthen the image.

    http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...ting-trumpeter

    I also did a B&W version which worked well, so you might try that as well!

    Cheers

    Randy
    MY BPN ALBUMS

    "Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Here is one possible B/W conversion -- difficult to decide how to balance the tonalities (how dark or light to make the blue relative to the feather), but I think I favor this one. I thought I would miss the blue-brown complements of the original, but I think this is a good alternative for a fairly abstract image -- thanks for the idea, Randy!

  7. #7
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Diane. Very nicely seen and captured! Excellent sharpness with your 1,200 mm "macro" lens, a pleasing mix of colors, and a perfect reflection. For me, the color version is more appealing - but that is my personal bias. I also like Randy's idea of toning down the rachis - a minor tweak to a very strong image.

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wonderful reflection and a lovely blue bkgd. I also think the bright white shaft and soft parts could be less bright. And I agree with the autofocus on the 5D3. I tried to capture flying gulls during a lull in my recent duck pond photography and it just wasn't fast enough.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, Steve and Nancy! I did tone down the rachis a little on the B/W but it still needs more, I think. I agree it's a good idea. I was surprised at how bright the reflection was and didn't change any relative tonalities in the OP.

    Wish I had gotten some birds this sharp....

  10. #10
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the image my only reservation is the principal quill, it seems to draw my eye a little. Colour or b&w like both equally.

  11. #11
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nicely seen (scene?), Diane. The perfectly calm water is a big plus for this tranquil image and the square comp works very well. Agree with toning down oof area (and wish it were feasible for it to be in focus…).

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks everyone! The DOF at this magnification is really frustrating. I don't think f/16 would have been much better. I will sometimes do a very quick focus stack of 2-3 shots (have made it work on dragonfly wings), but this feather was drifting and turning just a little too much.

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,991
    Threads
    192
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Simple, elegant, lovely! I like it as presented, toning down the highlights seems like a good idea. Very well spotted!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics