Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: A step too far?

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,058
    Threads
    101
    Thank You Posts

    Default A step too far?

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I have been going through 2012 archives from last winter and came across this. I had dismissed this at first as it was a miss in my mind at the time because I was tracking the hawk as it flew by but... took another look at it and wanted to see if folks think I am loosing my mind or if this actually works - maybe not as captured here but in concept. Sums up what a field mouse's view of a passing Harrier Hawk would be.

    I'll take zero comments as it doesn't work :) and I wont be offended.

    At the end of the day it's art which is purely subjective, but hey to be a successful artist someone besides me has to like it

    Cheers

    Jamie

    Camera Techs | Canon 1D Mark IV | 400mm F5.6 | 5.6 | 1/2000 | ISO400 | Handheld
    Last edited by Jamie Douglas; 12-17-2013 at 11:19 PM.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sarasota, Florida, United States
    Posts
    3,522
    Threads
    475
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It is very different for sure. I am glad to see that the focus locked on the bird even with the FG distraction. :)

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,546
    Threads
    171
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jamie, I think your concept is sound (ie field mouse vs Harrier) but I don't see anything in this image that makes it obvious that the viewer is or could be a fieldmouse.. I think that would be critical to make this work, but I have no ideas immediately how you might do that.. Nice idea though... Maybe its as simple as a little 'ground' in the foreground?

    DON

  4. #4
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jamie, if you want my honest opinion it doesn't work because the harrier is blocked and doesn't make a connection with the viewer.
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jamie, I'm with Arash, as it was HH could you not have tracked the bird until it was in clear air, however knowing this area it may not have been possible? Think we may need hi vis bibs next time?

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jamie, Im amazed that the camera didnt lock focus on the grasses. I like the flight pose, but maybe a bit small in the frame. I assume if there was a clear area, you would have posted that shot.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Euclid, Ohio
    Posts
    1,031
    Threads
    188
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Gotta agree with Arash and Steve. Maybe...maybe if that one big reed wasn't
    between you and the hawk, the concept could've worked.

    Doug

  8. #8
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    That's about as close as I ever get to Harriers. I'm also amazed that you had the bird in focus through all the grasses; did you focus manually? Unfortunately, there is just too much oof grass blocking the bird for it to work for me, but I like the idea.

  9. #9
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Gotta be honest too and say this would be an instant delete for me. The mouse would have to be rather tall...perhaps more like a coyote spying on the harrier!

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,058
    Threads
    101
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cheers for the comments folks and I thank you for your feedback. Yes this was auto focus and yes it is surprising the AF stayed on the subject. Just goes to show the 1D IV aint half bad.

    This was one of those images you look at and go hey, this is a rule breaker in a lot of senses but might be worth seeing what the crowd on BPN have to say. I value the comments from folks on here as some of the best critique out there so no harm done to the ego and again thank you.

    For records sake Daniel, the mouse was on a log... a big log with a step ladder

    Cheers

    Jamie

  11. #11
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jamie:

    I studied the image before reading your comments, and my thoughts ran to the prey hiding from the predator, so I think that part does work, on a very basic level. We have all hidden and looked out a threat, or bully, or a friend in a game of hide and seek, and can relate to this.

    The overall effect may not be strong enough to compensate for the blocking of the bird etc., but I would probably keep it, in my bin labeled 'concepts'

    Cheers

    Randy
    MY BPN ALBUMS

    "Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics