Not ideal, as the Gannet is moving away, too big in frame (IMHO), plus having the head touching the wing, but I thought this might be a little different with the sea crashing below? The Gannets at this location, not Bempton would launch themselves off and with the updraft, just hoover for a few seconds, then turn and dive. Ideally the 300/f2.8 with the 1.4 would have been better, but again a trade off trying to second guess, oh for the 200-400 then. Difficult to try and control the whites & darks, however the right wing, furthest away just must catch some light as this is as shot, no lifting of the shadows.
Not a location if you suffer from heights, but just great to be out there and even to watch.
Thanks to those who posted a reply or looked at the previous image.
Steve
Subject: Gannet on uplift (Morus bassanus)
Location: UK
Camera: Canon MKIV
Lens: 500f/4 HH Gitzo tripod/Wimberley head
Exposure: 1/1250s at f/8 ISO400 -0.33 stop compensation
Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.
Hi Steve, certainly a different gannet pose from the norm - works for me. Exposure looks great, and love the concentrated stare, and the gannet pops nicely from the darker BG.
It certainly looks like a windy day and great feather detail considering the wind. Size in frame isn’t an issue for me given the level of detail to look at.
.
Head angle be damned that is one rockin' pose. So dynamic. SH and EXP perfect. I could do without the other bird. All in all super dramatic.
BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.
BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.
Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,
I really like the pose Steve. It is quite different and makes up for the ha for me. I'm not sure about the bg . Love the feet too. I thought the crashing wave was an oof bird and felt it was a little distracting.
Hi Steve,
i agree with yourself about the image , but i still like it, great IQ and i am all the time fascinated by your sharpening techniques .
Looking at the image i think there is a warm cast running across the image, do not know if you wanted it that way, but the whites are looking murky.
There is a gap on RHS in the histogram, so you did not go to the limit regarding the whites, think you did not want to blow the whites.
I took the liberty to address the issues , minor ones, WDYT? Did i go too far?