Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: American Oystercatcher - Need Advice on Exposure

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, California, United States
    Posts
    3,023
    Threads
    416
    Thank You Posts

    Default American Oystercatcher - Need Advice on Exposure

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This is a new species for me, so I'm keen to learn how to exposure properly. I found this bird on a rock near the break water in Ventura Harbor, California. It was a bit far, so I put on the 2X and waded out a little bit. Still had to crop to about 30%.

    1DX
    500f4 II + 2X III
    1/800
    f9
    ISO-1600
    Handheld
    Image taken shortly after sunrise.

    Converted in LR5 and imported to CS6
    In CS6, via Levels, I saw that the Red beak and the white wash on the rock were over-exposed and I burned some fo the highlights. Yet, the dark feathers on the bird's neck looked under-exposed.

    My question is how do you exposure for such a situation? I hope to see these guys again and would love to handle the exposure better.

    The OOF rock was a distraction, but there is nothing I could do about it. I was distracted by a Pelican fishing and the Oystercatcher took off.

    As it turned out, this was a very costly image. I found my car key in my trousers soaked with sea water and dead. I had to call my wife to come for a rescue and while answering my call at an intersection, she got a non=moving ticket, and the image is not even good :(

    Happy Thanksgiving Everyone!

    Loi

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    New Bloomfield, Missouri, United States
    Posts
    430
    Threads
    92
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    My question is how do you exposure for such a situation?
    I don't see any problem with the exposure with what you have here. You have a full tonal range and have rich detail in the shadows of a very dark bird.

    The OOF rock was a distraction
    I agree. I think it ruins the picture and I don't see how to fix it.

    As it turned out, this was a very costly image.
    Yikes! The trouble we go through to capture pictures of birds!

    Keep on shooting!

  3. #3
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Everything is good but for the big o-o-f rock in front of the bird. There are no hard exposures in digital: just get a good amount of data in the rightmost histogram box without having any significant blinkies on the subject... See the Exposure Simplified section in ABP II.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    8,509
    Threads
    827
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    As it was mentioned Loi, the OOF rock is not the best feature of the image. The rest including the exposure pose and details are all good.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, California, United States
    Posts
    3,023
    Threads
    416
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you Henry, Artie, and Karl for your comments. I guess I was a bit unsure whether I had over/under exposed this image. I did use a brush in LR5 to lighten the shadow on the neck and the burn tool on the highlights. Will try yo find these birds again. Loi

  6. #6
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    For the light quality you had (which is nice and rich) your exposure is very good. It is normal to then use processing to touch up areas of over/underexposure even with proper in-camera exposure for high contrast subjects as the dynamic range of todays DSLRs is just not 100% there yet...but they are getting better and better though! I agree about the rock.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics