Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Two Giraffes

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default Two Giraffes

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    It is hard to know what to do with animals in the middle of the day, as was this one. The blue sky was pale and uninteresting and the nearest giraffe had a heavy shadow down his neck so I've experimented a little with crop and processing. I love giraffes in black and white and because the composition is so stark, I went for a high contrast which rendered the sky almost white. I always intended this to go to black and white, but changed the crop to vertical from horizontal. I wanted the background giraffe to be out of focus.

    1DX; EF200-400mm f4 EXT engaged; 560mm; ISO640; 1/640 @ f16

    I realise that many will question the high ISO but I found it more versatile going from the heavy shade of midday then out into the bright light.

  2. #2
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Hilary, I quite like the composition and for me it has a hint of David Lloyd about it, but the heavy, dark shadows and blacks isn't quite cutting it for me. I do agree they do lend themselves to B/W and can be very graphic in their look.The RHS one almost has that statuesque carving we often see at the airports You may wish just to look at your masking, as the bottom corner segment to me should be dark, not light as per the LH giraffe? Be interesting to see what would happen if you opened the blacks up a little?

    With the 1DX ISO640 is really not high, my default is 800 and often shoot at 1600 or 2500, however if you wanted the BKG giraffe OOF why go for f/16, I though you could have easily used a wider DOF to get the same look? What was the EV set too?

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Steve,
    Thanks for the feedback. The bottom rhs is getting lighter because that's where the shadow stops. I cropped the back of the giraffe as it was in the sunlight as well and was that same brightness. I should have burned the lighter shoulder in, but never gave it a thought.

    I understand your point on the heavy blacks, but when I processed the giraffe without them I really didn't like it as much. I'm guessing that most of the feedback will be similar re the heavy blacks so I may have to take the criticism on the chin. :)

    F16 wasn't totally necessary but the background giraffe was quite a distance away and I didn't want him to become a fuzz ball, but I agree that I could have dropped it somewhat. I'm not the most technical photographer and provided I'm within my ballpark I tend to concentrate on mood and what may happen with the scene, so I often miss some of the changes that could improve things. I think I'm too old to change now, sadly. Frustrates me and everyone else!!!!

  4. #4
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I'm guessing that most of the feedback will be similar re the heavy blacks so I may have to take the criticism on the chin. :)
    Feedback is there to distill from, it's you choice in what you keep, and what you discard.

    In light of what you said, perhaps f/16 was correct to avoid a 'blob', however as you were there, easier to know what to go for. Thee is nothing wrong with 'mood' settings, I just wish I could combine that with some of my images. Leopards & spots, went out with Rousey a while back and was only allowed to take the 70-200, with that discipline it makes you think about other ways to shoot!
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  5. Thanks Hilary Hann thanked for this post
  6. #5
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Hilary - I rather like the starkness of this. The comp works very well with the oof giraffe. I agree on burning that one piece in the lrc to darken it. I think you used the deep shadow to your advantage.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  7. Thanks Hilary Hann thanked for this post
  8. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    637
    Threads
    78
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I think this is something quite different to what I have seen before and you have done well here Hilary. The oof giraffe definitely makes this work well for you. TFS

  9. Thanks Hilary Hann thanked for this post
  10. #7
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,906
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Hillary,
    like it as presented, i am more open minded now , thanks to Mr D.

    Like the image design with the OOF giraffe adding depth to the image.Like the tones , think you made the best out of the lightning situation.
    Only suggestion i have is lighten that eye a tad, to make it a bit more visible, even if it is looking good for print, here it needs a bit more life, for my eyes.

    TFS Andreas

  11. Thanks Hilary Hann thanked for this post
  12. #8
    BPN Member Anette Mossbacher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,818
    Threads
    95
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Hilary,
    the comp works for me very well. The darks for sure do, love it that way, as well that the BG giraffe is not so "present" in this image like the FG giraffe.
    Had a laugh about Andreas "alive eyes" I get that also from him, but he does not tell the how to

    Have a great day

    Ciao Anette

  13. Thanks Hilary Hann thanked for this post
  14. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you everyone, lots of very helpful comments. I will go back and tidy some things up so very grateful.

    Steve, I find that there are some very helpful exercises when in the field to change the way I look at comps just by changing lens. Despite loving the 200-400, I've come home with some of my best images from the 70-200 and the 17-40. I think I need a second body, a 5d3 would be fine, so that I can have a second lens attached to increase flexibility. I did have the 7D ready as a second body, but who wants to use it along side the 1DX!!!! Terry has a different way of shooting, using his Fuji X Pro 1 set to show b&w more often than his 5d2 and he is seeing the scenes completely differently. Quite an eye opener and made me think.

  15. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    UK / RSA
    Posts
    407
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like it Hilary. I think the shades and tones on the RH giraffe are super, I only wish the the LH giraffe, even though it is OOF, could be a bit darker to echo the shades of the one on the right.

  16. Thanks Hilary Hann thanked for this post
  17. #11
    Landscapes Moderator Andrew McLachlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Thornton, Ontario
    Posts
    6,039
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Hilary, I love the high-key look to this B&W conversion. I think it is a very effect way to present it. The OOF fella is also in the perfect position to add depth. Very well done !

  18. Thanks Hilary Hann thanked for this post
  19. #12
    BPN Member Steve Uffman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    77
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I liked the part about the hint of David Lloyd!

  20. Thanks Hilary Hann thanked for this post
  21. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Martin, Andrew and Steve.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics