Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Common Tigertail

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    637
    Threads
    78
    Thank You Posts

    Default Common Tigertail

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This an image from a while back when I was still figuring out things.

    HH
    7D - my "macro" 300mm f2.8L IS USM MK II plus 2 x extender MK III
    ISO 800 - f5,6 - 1/4000 sec

    LR5 basics
    PSE 9 - LM and adjustment layers, levels, Nik Efex Pro - detail extractor 25% - USM

    C&C welcome

  2. #2
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A very nice shot indeed, I sense the blacks are a little heavy and the tail is just a fraction OOF - minor nits a very good image. I know I sound like a parrot but I would love to see one without the Nik effect filter - I may be wrong but it is my guess this is what is making it a bit heavy and contrasting.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very cool dragon, Carl; I've not seen this species before. Very interesting patterns on thorax, and the very striking eye came out quite well indeed (without that appearance of softness that so often occurs with in-focus dragon fly eyes). Your slightly out of square POV works well compositionally, but results in softness at the aft end of the abdomen. A very pleasing image. IMHO, the comp would be stronger with the subject much higher and slightly further back in the frame, which would also avoid clipping the base of the flower (receptacle).

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I love the colours you got here, both on the subject and in the BG (although some of the bigger streaks could be softened in there). I agree pointing your lens down a tad would have been great here to get the subject higher in the frame with more perch showing. Quite sharp and the eyes are spectacular.

  5. #5
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Carl. Love those eyes! Nice overall sharpness - the slight softness at the tip of the abdomen is not bothering me - and the background is pleasantly OOF. I would agree that this image would be even stronger if the subject was higher in the frame with more of the perch showing at the bottom. Overall, this is very nicely done!

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    637
    Threads
    78
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A bit late getting back here. Thanks all for the comments and I will work on the points mentioned.

    Jonathon I very seldom use Nik Efex but I will look at it from your point of view. Thinking back I was trying to tone down the highlights running the length of the tail by burning them, I think this is what darkened the blacks. Anyway I will work it out. Thanks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics