Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Beez!

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Andre Pretorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hluhluwe, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    Posts
    1,237
    Threads
    135
    Thank You Posts

    Default Beez!

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I think it is about time that I climb out of my box!

    A collage of 4 images with an interesting BG shot around the feeder. The idea came to me after looking at the downloaded images with the little Bronze Mannikins. The original image was the bird in centre, cloned his companions in from the other 3 images.

    Nikon D3S with 600f4
    ISO 2500
    1/800 @ f5.6
    Aperture Priority.

    These little things are so fast and so small, you can not get any closer to get an inflight image FF.

    (Hope I posted in correct category?)
    Regards

    Andre.

    www.gappimages.com

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Your collage is well done! You did an amazing job with the blurred wings! You might consider moving the bird on the lower left back into the image more. Since it is looking down I think it could use more room "to look into". That would also vary the space between birds. You captured 4 great flight poses and I like that the birds are all looking in the same direction. The bkgd is beautifully blurred yet lively in color.

  3. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wonderful!! I could go with just the 3, leaving out the one on the top left.

    Hope to see more of your wilder side here!

  5. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  6. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    southeast Michigan
    Posts
    2,846
    Threads
    208
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like it for some of the same reasons as Nancy -- the blur of the wings, and the color and lack of focus in the background. She makes a good point about varying the space between the birds, and I agree with Diane about leaving out the upper left bird to leave three.

  7. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  8. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    You did a great job of putting this image together. As others have said, lovely blurred but bright bg sets off the gray birds nicely. I, too, would vote for eliminating the top left bird, or maybe switching places with the bottom left. But, nice as it is. This is the right forum for this type of image. Hope to see more.

  9. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  10. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Southern Illinois
    Posts
    2,615
    Threads
    383
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Agree with above, esp re deleting the top left bird. He's too "sharp" to fit the others, and there's a rule in many areas (like flower arranging, etc) that says keep things in 3s.

  11. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  12. #7
    BPN Member Kerry Perkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Simi Valley, California
    Posts
    8,310
    Threads
    1,048
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hello Andre, your image makes me smile and I like that! The background is super and I like different flight poses. I do agree with others on the issue of removing the one bird. Odd numbers of objects in images do tend to work better sometimes. Looking forward to more.
    "It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera... they are made with the eye, heart, and head." - Henri Cartier Bresson

    Please visit me on the web at http://kerryperkinsphotography.com


  13. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  14. #8
    Lifetime Member Andre Pretorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hluhluwe, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    Posts
    1,237
    Threads
    135
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thank you Nancy for suggestions and comments!
    Tried to move bottom bird with Move tool after lasso, the resulting white area where the bird was, could not be fixed properly. Decided to rather add canvas!

    Thank you Diane, Dennis, Anita, Hazel and Kerry! I have newer done flower arrangements, but I think it is time to learn, if it would improve my PS skills!

    Some technical questions: what is the "best" way to remove an object- In this case used Patch tool, then cloned in @ 20% to smooth out.

    Thank you all for comments and suggestions!

    Andre
    Regards

    Andre.

    www.gappimages.com

  15. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andre Pretorius View Post
    Thank you Nancy for suggestions and comments!
    Tried to move bottom bird with Move tool after lasso, the resulting white area where the bird was, could not be fixed properly. Decided to rather add canvas!

    Thank you Diane, Dennis, Anita, Hazel and Kerry! I have newer done flower arrangements, but I think it is time to learn, if it would improve my PS skills!

    Some technical questions: what is the "best" way to remove an object- In this case used Patch tool, then cloned in @ 20% to smooth out.

    Thank you all for comments and suggestions!

    Andre
    I can't help with how to move objects--that is a skill I don't have. Having uneven number of objects is one of those "rules" that often works. But, as with most rules, it can be ignored. I think 4 birds would work fine in your image. Perhaps the main issue was that the 4th bird didn't seem to fit with the feel of the other birds. Anyway, what matters most is that you are pleased with your images.

  16. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  17. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    637
    Threads
    78
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It does look better I must admit. It looks like a bit of work goes into this. Well done Andre in another venture. Perhaps you could now have a small area in your shop allocated to a florist section

  18. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  19. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    southeast Michigan
    Posts
    2,846
    Threads
    208
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andre Pretorius View Post
    . . . Some technical questions: what is the "best" way to remove an object- In this case used Patch tool, then cloned in @ 20% to smooth out.

    Thank you all for comments and suggestions!

    Andre
    I think you did a great job removing the bird. Doing a loose selection with the Lasso tool followed by Edit>Fill with Content Aware chosen will often do it very well and very quickly. However, with a background like this, it's not likely to work too well.

  20. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  21. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great result!!

    The Patch tool would be the first thing I'd try, then if that doesn't work, select the area and try Content-Aware Fill.

    You got the white area because you moved it on the same layer, with no way for a fill to occur. After it's selected do Ctrl-J to copy it to another layer, then that can be moved, and masked as needed. Then after it is moved, the original location can be filled in.

    Beware for some subtle posterization to occur with large areas of fill on a plain BG -- you'll need to fix that with cloning.

    And of course when an element is added, keep it on its own layer, for future editing for the little things you didn't notice. They never show up when you need to see them.

  22. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  23. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,458
    Threads
    682
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the repost, although I think the first would work with more canvas to the left. The BG is great and the poses delightful!

  24. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  25. #14
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,162
    Threads
    668
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Blurred wings are hard to mask. You did a great job here. The collage is attractive, but also interesting as it allows a study of the movement of the wings. Very nice background also.

  26. Thanks Andre Pretorius thanked for this post
  27. #15
    Lifetime Member Andre Pretorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hluhluwe, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    Posts
    1,237
    Threads
    135
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you Anita, Carl and Dennis
    Thank you Jackie and Mitch

    Diane, valuable advice as ever, appreciated!
    Regards

    Andre.

    www.gappimages.com

  28. #16
    BPN Member Cheryl Slechta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Micanopy, Florida
    Posts
    8,383
    Threads
    841
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi, Andre, I'm late with a comment but welcome to OOTB! I think I like your original post as well as the repost, in fact I like them both a lot. I agree that if you keep 4 that a little more room on the left would be better. I hope we see more of your images
    "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly" - The Little Prince

    http://tuscawillaphotographycherylslechta.zenfolio.com/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics