Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Red-breasted Merganser (female).

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red-breasted Merganser (female).

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This species, and the Common Merganser, is quite skittish and spooks very easily up here and it is often difficult to get within 100 yards of them. On those rare times that some come close it is a treat to see and photograph. For this image I was tucked in between some large rocks along a jetty that goes down into the Ottawa River. I was calling in some Horned Grebes when this one and a female Common Merganser swam by. They were at first unaware of my presence but their acute perception of their surroundings got the best of them and they spotted me...that was the end of that opportunity! AT least the Horne Grebes stuck around. Here you can see the a strand of river weed strung along its body...

    Canon 7D + 500mm f/4 II + 1.4TC, manual exposure, evaluative metering, 1/640s., f/5.6, ISO 800, natural light, handheld, cropped for composition left and bottom.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    El Slavador
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    106
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like it Daniel.

    I notice that you are using your 1.4TC often. I have stopped using mine because I lose IQ most of the time... Only under certain circumstances I find it acceptable... but you have the 500mm f/4 II and I have version I. Do you use the 1.4TC III or II?

    enrique

  3. #3
    BPN Member Alan Murphy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    2,193
    Threads
    467
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful image Daniel.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    love the low angle, pose and details! well done Dan!
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the soft light in this image and the ethereal quality .
    Love the way the foreground merges with the BG.
    IQ excellent as always.
    I really like all the space you have left around the merganser and the little pop of green adds a little unexpected twist,
    Gail

  6. #6
    Forum Participant Ágúst Svavar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Iceland
    Posts
    27
    Threads
    7
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    this species is quite common here and they are very skittish and its not an easy job to get close enough for a good shot.
    I really like the exposure and IQ.. beautiful image

  7. #7
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks everyone!

    Enrique, I use the version III and see no visible loss of IQ. I'd be surprised to see any huge loss of IQ with the other versions too combined with this lens (either versions). Have you done any micro adjustments with your gear?

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    El Slavador
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    106
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Cadieux View Post
    Enrique, I use the version III and see no visible loss of IQ. I'd be surprised to see any huge loss of IQ with the other versions too combined with this lens (either versions). Have you done any micro adjustments with your gear?
    Yes, I have done micro adjustments Daniel. I should do that again. How often do you do it?

    I do see a slight loos of IQ with the TC version II and the 500 I, but not all the time - I cant predict when or why, so I only use it if I have to. I do see more chromatic aberration with the TC than w/o under certain light conditions... but this is for another thread... ;)

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, California, United States
    Posts
    3,023
    Threads
    416
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Daniel, I like the soft light and pastel colors. Excellent low POV and details. Well done. Loi

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Johannesburg - South Africa
    Posts
    2,114
    Threads
    190
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Stunning Daniel, great IQ you managed to get here. I like the cool colours and soft light, nicely done.

  11. #11
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Love the soft light and gray water/BG. For me the green river weed makes the image.

    To Enrique, the 1.4x (II or III) should barely be noticeable optically when paired with either the 500 I or 500 II. I've never had to microadjust any combination of lens and teleconverter, much less have to do it more than once. I'd be interested to see a 100% RAW file crop of a frame with the focus issue you describe; include your EXIF data too. Maybe you could start a thread on the Photography Gear forum.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Rotonda West , FL
    Posts
    3,642
    Threads
    198
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful. Congrats on getting her nice and close

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    El Slavador
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    106
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Brown View Post
    To Enrique, the 1.4x (II or III) should barely be noticeable optically when paired with either the 500 I or 500 II. I've never had to microadjust any combination of lens and teleconverter, much less have to do it more than once. I'd be interested to see a 100% RAW file crop of a frame with the focus issue you describe; include your EXIF data too. Maybe you could start a thread on the Photography Gear forum.
    Thanks Doug. I will try to do that this weekend

    cheers,

    enrique

  14. #14
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Dan, love the low shooting angle, together with the dead straight looking ahead pose. The colours on the head and bill pop nicely against the grey BG, and I would just take a bit off the top.

  15. #15
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Haliburton, Ontario
    Posts
    886
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This would be beautiful printed, framed and hung on a wall! Love the simplicity.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics