Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: dragon

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,065
    Threads
    1,300
    Thank You Posts

    Default dragon

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    nikon d 300 iso 400
    sigma 150 mm

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It looks like you got great sharpness -- I'd love to see it bigger. What would you think about taking some off the right, halfway into the leaf?

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like this one, Stuart. Nice detail within your DOF, pleasing subject. I suggest cropping about half the negative space from the left, but not the right. Did you consider darkening the bright areas of the BG. Looks like could use a little NR on BG as well.

  4. #4
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Fine focus and detail, lovely colours - is it so or is the contrast a little high - either way it works! The background is a little patchy I would blend it a little so it would not be quite so obtrusive.
    You will never get all the wings in focus in shots like this, but thta is not a big deal. I suspect you have many images - do you have any with the nearest wing in focus, if so you may find the presentation improves a little. Keep 'em coming, they have almost completely disappeared in my neck of the woods.

  5. #5
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Stuart. Very nice sharpness (within your DOF), light, and colors! As already noted above, I would suggest trying to blend the bright and dark areas of the background and also run some nr on the background. The comp works for me, but you might experiment with the cropping suggestions above for alternative presentations. Overall, this is very nicely done!

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,065
    Threads
    1,300
    Thank You Posts

    Default redone

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    blend performed?

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I do prefer the BG in repost.

  8. #8
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Repost better - perhaps consider desaturating a little.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The BG is nicer with the lighter tones given a brush of green. How did you do it?

    On my monitor the image is underexposed. I pulled it into PS and the histogram was almost all in the left half. I put a Curves adjustment layer on it and pulled up the center of the curve, and things looked a lot better to me. That also made the BG a little brighter again, but maybe whatever you did to it could be done again -- it worked very well.

    That lightening of tones also gives an appearance of slight desaturation.

    BTW -- there is no tagged profile. I assigned sRGB and the appearance didn't change, so that's what it was, just didn't get tagged. That can make it show incorrectly in some browsers.

  10. #10
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Diane the histogram is mostly to the left this is because most of the tones are darker rather than lighter. If you press Alt when using the right slider you will see it is in fact well exposed - the highlights are at the right side. Having said that the higest highl;ights are specular and not too troublesome so a slightly brighter image does look ok.
    Just as an aside if tiffs are converted to jpeg using "Save for Web" i.e. Ctrl Alt Shift S, the tiff will be converted to jpeg as srgb automatically in CS6 - (and probably CS4 onwards??) - earlier versions there is a tick box "convert to srgb". Hope this helps.

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    In my CS6 the Save for Web dialog still has the same old check boxes to convert to sRGB and also to embed the profile. Those settings are sticky, but the checkboxes should still be there. I'm curious -- do some people not have those boxes?

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    274
    Threads
    71
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the detail in the wing venation.

    Bill

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Polokwane South Africa
    Posts
    274
    Threads
    22
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Stuart... excellent detail and angle... love the blended version... overall a great shot... WD!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics