Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Common Snipe

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Northamptonshire, UK
    Posts
    451
    Threads
    152
    Thank You Posts

    Default Common Snipe

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    i had a great weekend with the birds this week. Weather conditions weren't that good with quite poor light and I have to contend with massive glare of the surrounding water and mud flats which made it very difficult to expose for. Whether this is the right way, but I decided to use around +2ev to bring out the subject and over expose the water. Its made for a tough time deciding how best to process the image. I brought out the details using Colour Efex Pro 4 ( detail Extractor ) Comments are greatly appreciated on how to improve this.

    Canon 7D, 500mm + 1.4, f5.6, 1/1000, +2ev, ISO1000 - DPP and Photoshop CC

  2. #2
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Simon:

    I think your basic strategy is sound to use sig. +ev to compensate for the bright background and more properly expose the bird. Would also be a good time to shoot manually, if the overall illumination level was fairly constant. Just expose correctly for the bird and let the bg fall where it may.

    I do see quite a bit of purple aberration in the water from the processing/compression. There are some processing halos around, esp. noticeable around the head and neck.

    I like the basic composition

    Cheers

    Randy
    MY BPN ALBUMS

    "Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Northamptonshire, UK
    Posts
    451
    Threads
    152
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Randy and good to know the info. I also see the halo's and this must be down to sloppy post processing. Quite annoyed with myself... I'l go back and take another look. In the case of this image - the original was hugely contrasty so the contrast has been reduced etc after i've processed it so the halo I think is the brush from brushing back the sharpening on the bird.

    I now see the purple abberation which look awful - wish I'd seen that before I posted it.

    Thanks again.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Michael Gerald-Yamasaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA USA
    Posts
    2,035
    Threads
    311
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Simon,

    Greetings. Agree with Randy's comments. You might consider a crop without the stuff on the right. Doesn't add much to my eye. Thanks for posting.

    Cheers,

    -Michael-

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Pune, Maharashtra, India
    Posts
    7,409
    Threads
    469
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful image with nice environment. Well balanced composition. Rest is mentioned by Randy Sir.

    Regards,
    Satish.

  6. #6
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Simon a great result. Purely a personal viewpoint I would process in ACR and CS6, I use Topaz Denoise on the background and sometimes lightly on the subject, I sharpen for web using Philip Perold technique. Many will disagree but in my hands I get less noise than using alternative ways including DPP - believe me I have tried and tried!

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Northamptonshire, UK
    Posts
    451
    Threads
    152
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks all and Jonathan for the tip. I've not heard of the Phillip Perold sharpening technique. I also use Topaz Denoise which I quite like.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics