Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Moth

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,162
    Threads
    668
    Thank You Posts

    Default Moth

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    There are a lot of these around right now. I am completely ignorant as to what they are, but I liked his position on the flower.

    Nikon d7000 with 55mm f3.5. Image stack.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cute, whatever it is, and a nice pose on the flower! Looks like it was in full sun and the resulting somewhat harsh texture appears to be brought out a little too much by sharpening. Conversely the flower looks like it has been desaturated and lowered in contrast too much in comparison. I'd bet there is enough information in the RAW file to strike a more even balance.

  3. #3
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mitch I don't know where you live but that looks very much like a skipper species which is a butterfly. I like the colours and composition it makes for a pleasing image.
    If you had not told me it was a stack I would have suggested the butterfly is a little over sharpened - maybe this is a consequence of stacking?/ I think it is a good image and I would ask if a stack was actually required - don't get me wrong we all have fun playing around with our images but I suspect one shot at f8 or f11 would have done the trick

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,162
    Threads
    668
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jonathan,

    Thank you for the ID. Yes, it does seem to be a skipper, and not a moth at all! I have never seen as many as we have this year. I guess they go in cycles. I am still learning about stacking, and I do tend to increase contrast too much...(I will work on that). I have tried photos of the skipper without stacking (Up to F16, and then sharpness was already dropping off), and find that I still cannot get everything within an acceptable focal plane. This skipper was slugglish as it was an early and cool morning. Even still, his antenna were moving, so I had to do some editing to remove the blur there. Stacking can be very frustrating, but I am learning that if I can control it, it will be a fun tool.

    Thanks again for your comments.

    M.C.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,162
    Threads
    668
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dianne,

    You are right. I actually desaturated, and darkened the flower to focus attention on the butterfly (thanks to Jonathan, I now know it is not a moth at all, but a skipper which is a butterfly).
    I think I went too far, and will try bringing the flower back to a more balanced tone. I find the stacking process does create a bit of harshness, and I should have reduced the contrast and run the background through a stronger noise reduction.

    Thanks for your comments.

    M.C.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics