Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Golden-mantled Ground-squirrel

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default Golden-mantled Ground-squirrel

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Here is another in my series of small wildlife. I photographed this ground-squirrel at the same time as the previous chipmunk. This shows the type of lichen-covered granite rocks in the area. Using "color range" under "select" in PS5 I selected the lighter colors of the rocks, then with "shadows & highlights" I reduced the highlights to lessen the glow-like look that appeared in the previous chipmunk image. These critters also live in the rocks but wake up later than the chipmunks. They then like to climb to the tops of the rocks and sit in the sun (they look like they are meditating ). It's very amusing to watch them stuff food into their pocket cheeks until they bulge. They are very fond of bits of fruit I sometimes put out at midday. At times they even come to my call. Note the very wet tail on this individual.

    Canon 5DMark III, Canon 300 f4 L IS, 1/500, f5.6, ISO 1250, manual exposure. Again I used the window frame for support as I sat inside.

    C & C most welcome.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,058
    Threads
    101
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy, I like your artistic approach to the natural tones here. In my mind, an example of how boosting contrast should be applied. Nice one and this image has a better balance than the last IMO. Cheers

  3. #3
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,917
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy,
    your PP skills are really coming to life, easy to see now.
    Not that exciting animal for a lot of people , i do find them always interesting.
    Like the colors , tonality and the framing with nice BG.

    I would try to tone down the lighter parts in the BG to make the squirrel stand out more, plus i would try to reduce contrast in the whole BG.

    Nice one

    TFS Andreas

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy - I'm glad you are safe. Nice image, again with good detail and I like the angled body. Good suggestions above and I would add a tiny bit more sharpening to the nose area.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Phoenix AZ
    Posts
    644
    Threads
    85
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    That is a "porker" of a golden mantled. Well ready for hibernation soon. Was the tail wet? Most I see have a fluffier tail. As with above, I really like what you did with the colors and love the lichens on the rock.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you all! Andreas, good suggestion about reducing contrast in the bkgd. Stan, this "porker" is indeed well fed. My ground-squirrels and chipmunks spend all day under the bird feeders eating what the birds have dropped. Sometimes I think they have paid off the Hairy Woodpecker just to dig seeds out of the feeder and throw them on the ground ! Yes, wet tail.

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy, I like the position and slight head turn, and the little critter does look a little bedraggled based on the tail.

    In my mind, an example of how boosting contrast should be applied.
    I have to disagree Jamie, the contrast is way too much as per Andreas reply, the image looks heavy, clogged in parts and is just too Contrasty. Also Nancy, I'm a little lost in the PP technique you mentioned, however if it works fine, but the H/S tool has to be carefully applied with a light hand. Remember Nancy, you don't always need to adjust all sliders, you may find only one or two need tweaking.

    I do like the rich tones of the subject and having a darker BKG does help to lift/separate the subject. If this is a regular feeding spot/set-up, then when they are not there just shoot to look at the BKG. If you then notice there are darker areas or hotspots then you can address them ready for the next shooting period. Helps in the long run.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  8. #8
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nancy, I like the subject and the lichen covered rock but I think there is a little too much contrast the image looks very dense or heavy. A quick look at levels indicates this to be the case. I know you were after a particular effect but I would be curious to see how the image might have looked with less contrast.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I went back to the drawing board with the suggestions. I used a lighter hand this time. Improved?

  10. #10
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy, I think comparing the two it's very subtle, however on the RP the whites look a tad hotter? Do you have the Highlight alerts set on your camera when you shoot/view your Histogram? What was the EV set to, 0 or -?
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  11. #11
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nancy the image still looks as if it is slightly OTT to me, the left side of the histogram and the right side both show clipping.

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hmmm...I am struggling with this one. I use manual exposure so I look closely at the histogram and should have seen blinkies. (Maybe the light behind me was too bright and I did not notice?) Not sure what OTT means, but I understand what you are saying. At this point I will go back to the very beginning and set up my camera at the window again and take more pictures. I will take this as a good reminder to be very, very aware of the histogram. Thanks so much for helping me!

  13. #13
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nancy if you want to fwd the raw via Dropbox, then happy to take a look and make some pointers.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics