Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: leopard in storm

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    70
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default leopard in storm

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I had the most amazing sighting of a leopard in the Maasai Mara. We spotted him out in the open, relaxing on a kopje, when we noticed the sky was getting darker behind him. It was late afternoon so at one point we had the dark sky in the background, and the setting sun on the leopard. I was having a bit of trouble processing this image, because whatever I seem to do, it almost looks like it's not real. In this image I just added a little contrast, added a little saturation to the green (because it was too greyish) and burned the shadows a little on the ground. that's all. What do you think? is it too much? or does it need something else? Would really appreciate some feedback! canon 5D mark III , 500mm 1:4 L IS USM, iso 800, f/4, 1/500

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    70
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    o, I forgot to mention: I shot the image at 5200 temperature, but lowered it to 4800. I also added a little brightness

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    70
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default leopard in storm II

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    this is another one, that I gave some extras: selective colour: black +4 and neutrals - black +4

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Nelspruit, Mpumalanga, South Africa
    Posts
    820
    Threads
    135
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Lovely sighting and image carol, i like the POV and the nice stare, the leopard slightly angled away from you is not a big issue as you can still see the face and eye nicely. I think your initial WB would work better or possibly something in between.The blacks a clipped quite a bit around the front legs and mouth, perhaps try pull these back a little from the original. The image looks like is lacking a little warmth and colour as well as a little more sharpness, below i added a little WD adjustment as well as some vibrancy and some USM.

    Attachment 131859
    Last edited by Brendon Cremer; 08-26-2013 at 04:19 PM.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Nelspruit, Mpumalanga, South Africa
    Posts
    820
    Threads
    135
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Definitely prefer the one with more eye contact Rachel.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Markus Jais's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bavaria (Germany)
    Posts
    1,677
    Threads
    82
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like both shots a lot. Like Brendon, I prefer the one with the eye contact.
    I like the composition and where you placed the cat in the frame.

    Markus

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, California, United States
    Posts
    3,023
    Threads
    416
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great sighting and lovely subject. Brendon PP hit it for me. I thought the sky was over saturated, but you were there. Yes, prefer the pose with the eye contact.

    Loi

  8. #8
    Forum Participant edwardselfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    South Luangwa, Zambia
    Posts
    701
    Threads
    26
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is nice - the image quality is lacking a bit though, and not sure why. Should be sharp on a 5D3 with 500f4 and 1/500 as long as you were rested on something. It just looks a little blocky/muddy as if it's a slightly blurred from camera shake and you've sharpened to fix it. Beautiful composition and situation though.
    Ed

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Carole - much prefer the one with the leopard turned toward you though I agree this doesn't have the IQ of some of your other posts. I also would back off on the blacks. Brendon's rp is the direction to go in.

    Please note that we encourage people to post comments on at least 5 other images for each image they post to foster a sense of community and learning. It would be great if you would give your thoughts about other images.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    70
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    both the images are pinsharp, but somehow it changes when I post it on this site. If I enlarge it to 100%, I can count the sharp hairs Thanks for you comment.

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    70
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    thanks Brendon, of course I like the one with the eye contact more. I was just working on the other one, and decided to post it, because whatever I learn here, I can apply it to all the images in this series. (and there are a lot!) I agree with the white balance, should be somewhere in between. I also agree about the blacks. So will give it another go. I would really like to enter one of this series in a competition, and want to make it perfect. I'll post the one in a few days. Another question: If I look in a magazine like National Geographic, a lot of the wildlife pictures show a lot of noise. Should I remove the noise or not, for such a competition?

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    70
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel, thank you for your comment, I totally agree. I know, I just didn't have the time yesterday. I will post comments on other pictures immediately Kind regards, Carole

  13. #13
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like your 2nd pose better, Carole. Please note that guidelines state that reposts should be of the same frame, we prefer seperate images altogether to be posted in separate threads.
    I also got the impression that the leopard may not be entirely in focus...since you are happy with the 100% RAW view it could only be something you could remedy in your processing workflow when it comes to sharpness for web. Remember that you need to sharpen after downscaling your photo!

    Ditto Rachel on wishing you could find time to contribute more to the critique of others' photos, every fresh pair of eyes helps!

    Quote Originally Posted by Carole Deschuymere View Post
    If I look in a magazine like National Geographic, a lot of the wildlife pictures show a lot of noise. Should I remove the noise or not, for such a competition?
    I think many of the NG explorers use any ISO they can to "get the shot", that's certainly my approach. It could also be that some of those published are actually from film/trannies and could just be film grain.
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  14. #14
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    NY Metro
    Posts
    312
    Threads
    46
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    What a healthy looking cat!
    Would love to see more of the shots once the sharpening-for-web issue is sorted in your PP. I personally would like a mid-point in warmth of the OP and Brandon's RP, and certainly the eye-contact image makes it even more better!

    TFS

  15. #15
    BPN Viewer Tom Graham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Southern California, Orange County
    Posts
    1,116
    Threads
    33
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Prefer the one with eye contact.
    Would like to see at least the front paws.
    To my strange way of thinking the best images stand by themselves. That is, no explanation needed by the title. Unless it is for instructional purposes. What I'm trying to say is - without your title the sky simply looks off to me. Or, the storm is not obvious.
    Tom

  16. #16
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    70
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for your comment Tom. I get what you're saying, in these pics the storm isn't Obvious. I will post another picture where it's a lot more Obvious. that's exactly the problem I'm having with this series, I know how it looked in reality, and the sky was exactly like that. but I understand people might think the sky looks strange or off.

  17. #17
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    70
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you Shreyas. I agree with you on the warmth, somewhere in between. I will post another one of this series .

  18. #18
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    70
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Morkel! I read the sticky again about the sharpening and posting for web. may have skipped a few steps Always in a hurry, not enough time for my pictures, especially now, since it's high season in my shop. But no excuse. my next post will be 'as it should' And I will certainly contribute more.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics