Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Marbled Godwit

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Kennebunk Maine
    Posts
    47
    Threads
    20
    Thank You Posts

    Default Marbled Godwit

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    We know the fall migration has started when a few Marbled Godwits appear on the south coast of Maine. This one enjoyed a good shake after preening.
    Canon 7D 400mm f5.6
    1/800 f/8 ISO 400 EV +1/3 Handheld prone in the mud.
    Many specular highlights and shell fragments removed from bg.

    Comments always appreciated.

    Ken

  2. #2
    BPN Member Bill Jobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,275
    Threads
    91
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Prone pays, Ken .... and this is a great example ! Your low-earth perspective strengthens this photo quantitatively.

    The ambient light, the catch light and the contrast between the blue water and sandy beach add a lot of interest.

    The one small distraction is that perfectly round light spot at upper left corner. It almost looks like a coin. There are several other round anomalies, especially on the beach in front of the bird.

    You mentioned you did some BG cleanup. You may wish to go back and clean some more, or pull a gaussian blur on it, as well as tame a bit the brightness of that rock just under the bird's bill.

    Don't get me wrong, this is a really excellent image. My suggestions are simply offered to mitigate distractions and keep the focus on the bird.
    Bill Jobes



    www.billjobes.com

    My BPN Gallery

    Walk Softly and Carry a Big Lens

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Kennebunk Maine
    Posts
    47
    Threads
    20
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the comments. The spot you mention is one of the highlights from shell fragments in the sand. That one was hidden by the metadata text in LR4 so I missed it. Something to watch for in the future.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Michael Gerald-Yamasaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA USA
    Posts
    2,035
    Threads
    311
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Bill,

    Greetings. Good looking Godwit. BG issues as mentioned - the specular highlights just in front of the neck, above the head and just behind the tail are the worst of it for me. I like the detail in the ruffed up feathers & the nice light.

    Cheers,

    -Michael-

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ken,

    Good comments above and I really love the low shooting profile....great field technique. Its a strong post...consider these opportunities:

    Crop off a small layer from the bottom...very small I like the entry profile of the frame and a bit off the top..remove the distracting brown thing on the top edge. Add a layer of sharpening too. Love the brown reflection under the bird and the HA and eye with catch-light are nice. Again...the low shooting angle allows the viewer to see what the world as the subject views it. Nice image, thanks for posting and keep em coming!

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    637
    Threads
    78
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ken
    Love the ruffled feathers and low angle. Good detail and light. I think everything else has been covered. TFS

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,549
    Threads
    1,284
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Ken, this is lovely, like the light posture and he ruffled feathers and the low POV really makes a different to the shot, adds interest.

    Now I'm away so relying on the macBook pro, not ideal, but I wonder if going a bit more 'pano' adds or not, as I just feel there is just a little too much FG water. You know better than I do as you were there, but I wonder about dropping the blue in saturation, was the water that rich? Perhaps 0 on the EV just to give a bit more tone & help the whites, however without seeing the Histogram it might have not been enough?

    Perhaps bumping up the mid tones in the feathers, dropping the exposure in the water to bring out some more detail and adding a hint more sharpening only to the subject, love the catchlight in the eye and sheen on the bill. Perhaps a little off the LHS & more on the RHS.

    Now I could be way off, it's just my take.

    Nice work overall.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics